Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-353/2008-RAN ECLI:DK:RAN:2023:BS0000002058 Généré par l'IA

Tenant's exclusion from co-ownership due to installing surveillance cameras on building facade dismissed.

Numéro de cause BS-353/2008-RAN
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the co-owners' claim to exclude the tenant based on his installation of surveillance cameras on the building facade. The tenant argued that the cameras were for personal security, while the co-owners contended they violated the building's peace and privacy. The court ruled that the tenant had no right to exclude others solely for this purpose as it did not constitute a fundamental breach of the lease or co-ownership agreement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

s. 117 af Ejendomsloven; s. 118 af Ejendomsloven: A tenant's installation of personal surveillance equipment on a shared facade does not automatically justify exclusion from the co-ownership unless it causes substantial disturbance or violates specific building regulations.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
co-ownership exclusion surveillance cameras building facade tenant rights peace and quiet action en exclusion de la communauté des copropriétaires exclusion d'un consortium association de locataires
Généré par l'IA
BS-1326/2011-VLR
Tenant acquitted after court rejects apartment owners' claim to exclude them for installing facade cameras.
BS-52615/2019-FRB
Shareholder exclusion and cost allocation in a civil dispute regarding company membership termination.
FS-13357/2013-ARH
Court dismisses exclusion claim because prior exclusion decision lacks legal basis for subsequent breach.
BS-50055/2023-OLR
Court upholds that a co-owner cannot sublet their share apartment without the association's consent.
BS-48912/2022-KBH
Court allows co-op member exclusion for unauthorized subletting of shareholding apartment under lease law.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Sagen drejer sig om, hvorvidt sagsøger andelsboligforening har været berettiget til at ekskludere sagsøgte som følge af, at han har monteret overvågningskameraer på facaden af sin andelsbolig