Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-2681/2011-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2023:BS0000000051 Généré par l'IA

Appeal dismissed; security for costs required to resume proceedings against defendant.

Numéro de cause BS-2681/2011-VLR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Appeal upheld the District Court's decision to dismiss the appeal, ordering the appellant to provide security for costs to resume proceedings. The appellant sought to restart litigation against the defendant, arguing the original judgment was flawed, while the defendant insisted on financial security before any resumption. The court rejected the appeal because the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient assets or creditworthiness to cover potential costs, necessitating the security requirement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Section 223 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Section 224 of the Code of Civil Procedure: An appeal may be resumed only if the appellant provides security for costs when the court finds the appellant lacks sufficient assets or creditworthiness to cover potential litigation expenses.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
security for costs resumption of proceedings Code of Civil Procedure asset insufficiency appellant liability costs protection appeal dismissal sûretés en garantie des dépens

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Section 223 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Section 224 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Généré par l'IA
BS-1208/2017-VLR
Vestre Landsret orders case reopened under strict security conditions due to new evidence potential.
BS-834/2011-VLR
Spousal divorce appeal dismissed; court upholds requirement for full security deposit under tax law.
BS-220/2008-VLR
Appeal court requires security for costs on case reopening despite defendant's absence explanation.
BS-397/2011-OLR
Appeal court upholds lower court's decision to reopen a small claims case after default judgment. The court confirms the general right to request case reopening under the Code of Civil Procedure. The decision clarifies that small claims rules do not exclude the general reopening provision. The court notes the defendant requested reopening within the statutory time limit. The appeal court affirms the lower court's ruling on reopening the proceedings.
BS-3185/2011-VLR
Court dismissed security release request, upholding lower court decision on security deposit.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Landretten har stadfæstet byrettens kendelse i sag om genoptagelse på betingelse af, at sagsøgte stiller sikkerhed for de idømte sagsomkostninger