Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
SS-2815/2009-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2023:SS0000000019 Généré par l'IA

Court dismisses appeal, upholding three-year ban on owning or handling livestock due to prior abuse conviction.

Numéro de cause SS-2815/2009-VLR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Vestre Landsret upheld the lower court's decision to impose a three-year prohibition on the defendant owning or handling livestock. The defendant, convicted of animal abuse, argued against the severity of the ban, but the court found the prior conduct warranted strict restrictions. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, confirming the ban prevents any personal engagement with animals for the specified period.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Straffeloven § 293; Straffeloven § 294: A conviction for animal abuse justifies a prohibition on owning or handling livestock, which remains in effect for a set duration regardless of the passage of time.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
animal abuse conviction prohibition on livestock criminal record ban Vestre Landsret appeal Straffeloven § 293 rehabilitation period personal engagement with animals vie familiale et professionnelle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Straffeloven § 293
Straffeloven § 294
Généré par l'IA
SS-99/2022-VLR
Dutch arsonist convicted of insurance fraud; accomplice acquitted; civil claim dismissed for lack of evidence.
SS-484/2021-VLR
Court upholds conviction for fraud and robbery but removes minimum stay for institutional placement due to defendant's mental condition.
SS-2797/2008-VLR
Court upholds 6-month prison sentence for repeated drunk driving during probation, correcting vehicle registration number.
SS-2331/2021-HOL
Court convicted defendant of animal welfare law violation for bottle-feeding lambs during ban period.
SS-2535/2022-VLR
Court upholds conviction for animal welfare law violation and imposes additional penalty due to prior offenses.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Byrettens dom stadfæstes med den ændring, at de tiltalte frakendes retten til at eje, bruge, passe eller slagte eller i det hele taget beskæftige sig personligt med dyr i 3 år