SS-1478/2013-VLR
ECLI:DK:VLR:2022:SS0000001275
Généré par l'IA
Court dismisses name ban appeal, ruling it violates freedom of expression and lacks sufficient public interest justification.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Vestre Landsret dismissed the applicant's appeal against a name ban imposed by the first instance court. The applicant argued that the ban violated their freedom of expression and was disproportionate given the passage of time since the original offense. The court held that the ban remained necessary to protect the integrity of the judicial system and public trust, finding the public interest outweighed the individual's rights.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAStraffeloven § 104; Lov om navneforbud § 1: A name ban imposed to protect the integrity of the judicial system is lawful if the public interest in maintaining judicial credibility outweighs the individual's freedom of expression, even years after the underlying offense.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
name ban
freedom of expression
judicial integrity
proportionality test
public interest
appeal dismissal
Straffeloven 104
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAStraffeloven § 104
Lov om navneforbud § 1
Lov om navneforbud § 2
Texte complet
Kendelse om navneforbud