Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-2008/2012-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2022:BS0000001699 Généré par l'IA

Court of Appeal orders three judges to hear case instead of two per law.

Numéro de cause BS-2008/2012-VLR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Appeal reversed the District Court's decision to dismiss the case for lack of a quorum. The District Court had ruled that only two judges were needed, but the appellate court found this violated the requirement for three judges. Consequently, the case must now be heard by a full panel of three judges.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Retsplejelovens § 12, stk. 3, nr. 1; Retsplejelovens § 226, stk. 1: A decision by a single judge or a panel of two judges is invalid if the law requires a panel of three judges.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
court of appeal quorum requirement panel composition judicial review procedural error complexité de la procédure prétention de tiers épuisement des voies de recours internes

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Retsplejelovens § 12, stk. 3, nr. 1
Retsplejelovens § 226, stk. 1
Généré par l'IA
BS-1058/2008-OLR
Court upholds lower court decision denying three-judge panel for civil case due to lack of complexity.
BS-441/2010-VLR
Court dismissed appeal regarding whether expert judges should assist in handling the case.
BS-1598/2013-VLR
Court dismisses appeal to replace trial judges with expert members due to lack of relevance.
BS-2763/2007-GLO
District court dismisses referral to High Court and three-judge panel request due to lack of precedent-setting issues.
BS-953/2008-OLR
Appeal upheld non-referral but reversed single-judge ruling to require three judges for special case character.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Byrettens kendelse om, at sagen ikke skal henvises til landsretten, jf. retsplejelovens §226, stk. 1, og der ikke skal deltage 3 dommere i afgørelsen af sagen, jf. retsplejelovens §12, stk. 3, nr. 1, er ændret således, at der skal deltage 3 dommere i afgørelsen