Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 B 9/20, 1 B 9/20 (1 C 5/20) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2020:260220B1B9.20.0 Généré par l'IA

Sufficiency of B1 German language proficiency as a "declaration by other means" to revoke non-German ethnicity entries under the Nationality Act

Numéro de cause 1 B 9/20, 1 B 9/20 (1 C 5/20)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) overturned the Higher Administrative Court’s refusal to admit an appeal and ordered that the case be remanded for further review, effectively ruling in favor of the complainant. The dispute concerned an individual’s attempt to amend a recorded non-German ethnicity (Volkstum) entry in their civil registry, specifically whether demonstrating German language proficiency at the B1 level of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages constitutes a valid "declaration by other means" under the relevant nationality statutes to revoke previous statements of affiliation. The BVerwG held that the issue possessed fundamental legal significance, requiring clarification on whether such language certification satisfies the statutory requirements for modifying ethnic designations, and accordingly ordered the admission of the revision proceeding under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Sufficiency of B1 German language proficiency as a "declaration by other means" to revoke non-German ethnicity entries under the Nationality Act: The dispute concerned an individual’s attempt to amend a recorded non-German ethnicity (Volkstum) entry in their civil registry, specifically whether demonstrating German language proficiency at the B1 level of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages constitutes a valid "declaration by other means" under the relevant nationality statutes to revoke previous statements of affiliation. The BVerwG held that the issue possessed fundamental legal significance, requiring clarification on whether such language certification satisfies the statutory requirements for modifying ethnic designations, and accordingly ordered the admission of the revision proceeding under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
nationalité condition légale emploi des langues discrimination linguistique interdiction de l'expulsion des nationaux litige non administratif

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The legal basis cited in the grounds for the dispositive order to admit the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Généré par l'IA
1 C 5/20
Late-comer status: insufficiency of B1 language skills to overcome explicit counter-confession to non-German nationality
1 C 8/09
Family reunification: validity of pre-entry language requirement and inapplicability of EU nationality non-discrimination to third-country nationals
1 B 61/21
Resettlement status: admissibility of complaint challenging sufficiency of evidence for overcoming counter-declaration of foreign ethnicity
1 B 2/16, 1 B 2/16, 1 PKH 2/16
German ethnicity admission certificate: lack of interest in justice does not arise from failure to provide B1 language proof where alternative certification methods exist
1 C 36/16
Late resettlement hardship inclusion: requirement of basic German language skills at time of entry and scope of special hardship

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The legal basis cited in the grounds for the dispositive order to admit the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Erfolgreiche Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde zu dem Erfordernis der Änderung eines Nationalitäteneintrags im Zusammenhang mit einem Bekenntnis auf sonstige Weise

[TENOR]

Die Entscheidung des Oberverwaltungsgerichts für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen über die Nichtzulassung der Revision gegen sein Urteil vom 13. November 2019 wird aufgehoben.

Die Revision wird zugelassen.

Die Entscheidung über die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens folgt der Kostenentscheidung in der Hauptsache.

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann der Klärung der Frage dienen, ob ein Bekenntnis auf andere Weise im Sinne des § 6 Abs. 2 Satz 1 i.V.m. Satz 2 Alt. 1 BVFG in Gestalt des Nachweises von deutschen Sprachkenntnissen auf dem Niveau B 1 des Gemeinsamen Europäischen Referenzrahmens für Sprachen genügt, um frühere Erklärungen zu einem nichtdeutschen Volkstum rückgängig zu machen.