Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
4 BN 27/19, 4 BN 27/19 (4 CN 7/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:250919B4BN27.19.0 Généré par l'IA

Grant of revision for subsequent divergence from prior case law

Numéro de cause 4 BN 27/19, 4 BN 27/19 (4 CN 7/19)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complaint for leave to appeal and ordered the admission of the revision proceedings, effectively prevailing for the appellant at this procedural stage. The dispute concerned a legal divergence, specifically where the judgment under challenge deviated from the Senate's own decision of June 6, 2019 (B 4 CN 7.18). The decisive legal basis for this outcome was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, which mandates the admission of revision in cases of subsequent divergence from a higher court's precedent, with the procedural cost and value assessment governed by §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Grant of revision for subsequent divergence from prior case law: The dispute concerned a legal divergence, specifically where the judgment under challenge deviated from the Senate's own decision of June 6, 2019 (B 4 CN 7.18). The decisive legal basis for this outcome was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, which mandates the admission of revision in cases of subsequent divergence from a higher court's precedent, with the procedural cost and value assessment governed by §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
révision d'une décision réclamation administrative préalable valeur litigieuse décisions incidentes motivation du revirement jurisprudentiel admission provisoire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
Legal basis for admitting the revision due to subsequent divergence from the Senate's previous decision.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
4 B 67/09, 4 B 67/09 (4 C 7/10)
Admission of revision due to divergence from established case law on construction law interpretation
4 BN 41/18
Admissibility of revision complaint: divergence ground requiring precise contrast of substantive legal propositions rather than editorial summaries
4 B 21/22
Non-admission of revision for revision complaint: cross-referencing prior Senate decision to waive detailed justification under § 133 Abs. 5 VwGO
10 B 15/15
Admissibility of revision for divergence and claim amendments in declaratory actions against chamber officials regarding affiliated association statements
5 B 32/18 D
Non-Admissibility of Revision: Specificity Requirements for Fundamental Significance, Divergence, and Procedural Errors in Compensation Claims for Excessive Proceedings

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO

Legal basis for admitting the revision due to subsequent divergence from the Senate's previous decision.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung wegen nachträglicher Divergenz

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO wegen nachträglicher Abweichung des angefochtenen Urteils von der Entscheidung des Senats vom 6. Juni 2019 - BVerwG 4 CN 7.18 - zuzulassen.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.