Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
4 BN 32/18, 4 BN 32/18 (4 CN 8/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:271118B4BN32.18.0 Généré par l'IA

Admissibility of sales floor area limitations within a special zone for a shopping center in a detailed development plan

Numéro de cause 4 BN 32/18, 4 BN 32/18 (4 CN 8/18)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the applicants' complaint for leave to appeal, admitting the case for full revision proceedings, thereby allowing the challenge to proceed to the next judicial instance. The dispute concerns the validity of the designation of a special zone (*Sondergebiet*) for a shopping center in a local development plan, specifically where that designation includes a limitation on sales floor space (*Verkaufsflächenbegrenzung*). The decision rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as the court determined that the issue whether and under what conditions such a sales space restriction can be validly established within a *Sondergebiet* is capable of clarification in revision, presenting a question of fundamental importance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Admissibility of sales floor area limitations within a special zone for a shopping center in a detailed development plan: The dispute concerns the validity of the designation of a special zone (*Sondergebiet*) for a shopping center in a local development plan, specifically where that designation includes a limitation on sales floor space (*Verkaufsflächenbegrenzung*). The decision rests on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as the court determined that the issue whether and under what conditions such a sales space restriction can be validly established within a *Sondergebiet* is capable of clarification in revision, presenting a question of fundamental importance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
zone commerciale recours contre des décisions administratives plan de quartier différend commercial restrictions de zonage vente spéciale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the appeal for revision due to fundamental legal significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the upcoming revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
4 B 14/21
Plot-specific sales floor limits in special areas derived from municipal retail concepts and the plan-conservatory interpretation of zone-wide numerical restrictions on single-parcel plots
4 CN 5/20
Invalidity of sales area restrictions in a special area zoning plan due to lack of legal basis for limiting the number of permitted shopping centers
4 BN 9/11
Differentiation of retail facilities by sales floor area as a valid zoning criterion under § 1 Abs. 9 BauNVO
4 B 8/16
Validity of a special area zoning plan excluding center-relevant retail and the permissibility of passive status protection for existing businesses
4 B 12/21
Municipal discretion to restrict retail floor area in special zones based on purchasing power analysis

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the appeal for revision due to fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the upcoming revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Sondergebiet für Einkaufszentrum mit Verkaufsflächenbegrenzung

[GRUENDE]

Auf die Beschwerde der Antragsteller wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. In dem Revisionsverfahren wird voraussichtlich geklärt werden können, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Festsetzung eines Sondergebiets für ein Einkaufszentrum mit einer Verkaufsflächenbeschränkung in einem Bebauungsplan zulässig ist.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.