Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
3 B 6/17, 3 B 6/17 (3 C 12/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:130718B3B6.17.0 Généré par l'IA

Applicability of General Railway Act provisions to tram line extensions with concurrent freight traffic

Numéro de cause 3 B 6/17, 3 B 6/17 (3 C 12/18)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted permission to file an appeal on points of law (Revisionszulassung) in a preliminary ruling, leaving the lower court's judgment otherwise in force pending the substantive appeal. The dispute concerned a planning approval procedure for the extension of a tram line that also involved the continued operation of a small volume of freight traffic on dedicated railway infrastructure. The core legal issue is whether the specific provisions of the General Railway Act (AEG) §§ 18 ff. (relating to the dedication of railway lines) apply to such mixed-use projects, a question the court deemed to have fundamental significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. The court also set a preliminary fee-bearing amount for the appeal under §§ 47, 63 GKG.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG; Applicability of General Railway Act provisions to tram line extensions with concurrent freight traffic: The dispute concerned a planning approval procedure for the extension of a tram line that also involved the continued operation of a small volume of freight traffic on dedicated railway infrastructure. The core legal issue is whether the specific provisions of the General Railway Act (AEG) §§ 18 ff. (relating to the dedication of railway lines) apply to such mixed-use projects, a question the court deemed to have fundamental significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. The court also set a preliminary fee-bearing amount for the appeal under §§ 47, 63 GKG.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
extension de la procédure procédure préjudicielle approbation des plans projet général transports ferroviaires droit des transports

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the appeal on points of law due to fundamental significance of the issue.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for cost purposes.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG
Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for cost purposes.
Généré par l'IA
3 B 8/17, 3 B 8/17 (3 C 13/18)
Scope of §§ 18 ff. AEG 1994 in planning approval for tram line extensions with residual freight traffic on dedicated railway installations
3 C 1/15
Scope of Railway Crossing Act: Applicability to crossings between two railways where one track carries concurrent tram traffic
3 C 12/18
Railway infrastructure upgrade for tram use: applicability of General Railway Act and necessity of environmental impact assessment for minor noise threshold exceedances
7 A 10/19
Plan approval for railway expansion: scope of alternative route review under statutory need plans and admissibility of unexposed traffic forecasts
7 C 14/13
Hangsicherungsmaßnahmen am Schienenweg: Eisenbahnbetriebsbezogenheit und Planfeststellungspflicht nach § 18 AEG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the appeal on points of law due to fundamental significance of the issue.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG

Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for cost purposes.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for cost purposes.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Anwendbarkeit der §§ 18 ff. AEG 1994; Verlängerung einer Straßenbahnlinie bei stattfindendem Güterverkehr

[GRUENDE]

Die Sache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das angestrebte Revisionsverfahren wird dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, unter anderem die Frage zu klären, ob für das Planfeststellungsverfahren zur Änderung von für den Eisenbahnverkehr gewidmeten Betriebsanlagen die §§ 18 ff. AEG zur Anwendung kommen, wenn das Vorhaben der Verlängerung einer Straßenbahnlinie dient, dort aber zugleich in geringem Umfang weiterhin Güterverkehr stattfinden soll.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.