Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
8 B 42/16, 8 B 42/16 (8 C 3/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:230117B8B42.16.0 Généré par l'IA

Entitlement to shareholdings in companies located outside the accession area under German property restitution law

Numéro de cause 8 B 42/16, 8 B 42/16 (8 C 3/17)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's complaint for leave to appeal, ruling that the higher court appeal is admissible based on fundamental legal significance, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the full appellate court. The dispute concerns a claim for an entitlement to shareholdings in companies, specifically challenging whether such an entitlement can be established for entities that were located outside the area of accession at the time of the damage under German property restitution law. The decision relies on §§ 1(6) and 3(1) sentence 4 second half-sentence of the Property Reconstruction Act (VermG), determining that the question of the temporal and geographic scope of restitution rights regarding post-accession shareholdings requires clarification by the Federal Administrative Court.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Entitlement to shareholdings in companies located outside the accession area under German property restitution law: The dispute concerns a claim for an entitlement to shareholdings in companies, specifically challenging whether such an entitlement can be established for entities that were located outside the area of accession at the time of the damage under German property restitution law. The decision relies on §§ 1(6) and 3(1) sentence 4 second half-sentence of the Property Reconstruction Act (VermG), determining that the question of the temporal and geographic scope of restitution rights regarding post-accession shareholdings requires clarification by the Federal Administrative Court.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
restitution de la propriété droit à la propriété personne morale droit à l'indemnisation extension de l'expropriation réclamation administrative

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited as the main ground for allowing the appeal due to fundamental significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the main ground for allowing the appeal due to fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren bietet voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zu klären, ob auf der Grundlage von § 1 Abs. 6, § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG die Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen festgestellt werden kann, die zum Zeitpunkt der Schädigung ihren Sitz außerhalb des Beitrittsgebiets hatten.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.