Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
4 B 47/16, 4 B 47/16 (4 C 9/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:151216B4B47.16.0 Généré par l'IA

Scope of “existing structures” to be considered for conformity with neighborhood character under § 34(1) sentence 1 BauGB

Numéro de cause 4 B 47/16, 4 B 47/16 (4 C 9/16)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, allowing the case to proceed to the Revisionsinstanz, thereby finding the defendant's appeal justified. The dispute concerns a planning law challenge regarding whether a proposed building project complies with the requirement to "fit in" with the character of the surrounding neighborhood under § 34(1) sentence 1 of the Building Code (BauGB), specifically focusing on the legal criteria for including existing structural installations in the assessment of the over-buildable area. The decisive legal basis is § 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO), under which the court determined that the appeal may contribute to clarifying the open legal question of which existing bauliche Anlagen (structural installations) must be considered to evaluate compatibility with the local building environment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 34 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BauGB, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Scope of “existing structures” to be considered for conformity with neighborhood character under § 34(1) sentence 1 BauGB: The dispute concerns a planning law challenge regarding whether a proposed building project complies with the requirement to "fit in" with the character of the surrounding neighborhood under § 34(1) sentence 1 of the Building Code (BauGB), specifically focusing on the legal criteria for including existing structural installations in the assessment of the over-buildable area. The decisive legal basis is § 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO), under which the court determined that the appeal may contribute to clarifying the open legal question of which existing bauliche Anlagen (structural installations) must be considered to evaluate compatibility with the local building environment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
règles de compatibilité charges du permis d'édifier mesure architectonique implantation de la construction organisation administrative construction illégale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 34 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BauGB
Revisionszulassung; Sich-Einfügen im Sinne von § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BauGB; Einbeziehung vorhandener baulicher Anlage
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, as it is the legal basis cited for granting leave to appeal.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
2 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions cited in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
4 B 29/18, 4 B 29/18 (4 C 10/18)
Inclusion of newly authorized structures in the determination of the character of the surrounding area under § 34 BauGB
4 B 51/17
§ 34 BauGB: Whether differing adjacent construction excludes inclusion in continuous built-up area and affects immediate neighborhood character
4 B 4/11
Visual appearance of full versus non-full stories as criterion for building conformity under § 34 BauGB
4 BN 1/15
BauGB § 34 Abs. 1: Organic settlement structure requirement notwithstanding sufficient building continuity and qualified planning
4 C 7/15
Unplanned inner area building permit: requirement for matching all dimensional factors (footprint, storeys, height) in reference buildings to fit neighborhood character under § 34 BauGB

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, as it is the legal basis cited for granting leave to appeal.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions cited in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Sich-Einfügen im Sinne von § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BauGB; Einbeziehung vorhandener baulicher Anlage

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Rechtsfrage beitragen, welche vorhandenen baulichen Anlagen in die Betrachtung einzubeziehen sind, um zu entscheiden, ob sich ein Vorhaben nach der überbaubaren Grundstücksfläche im Sinne von § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BauGB in die Eigenart der näheren Umgebung einfügt.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.