Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
3 B 55/15, 3 B 55/15 (3 C 22/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:280916B3B55.15.0 Généré par l'IA

Legal limits on arbitration boards’ setting of hospital-specific daily fees under the Hospital Remuneration Act

Numéro de cause 3 B 55/15, 3 B 55/15 (3 C 22/16)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court permitted the appeal on the merits, finding that the case holds fundamental significance, thereby allowing the appellate review of the arbitration board's decision to proceed. The dispute concerned the statutory limits on the competence of a medical arbitration board (Schiedsstelle) when determining hospital-specific daily fees under the Hospital Remuneration Act. The decisive legal basis for the court's ruling is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which grants appeal permission due to the need to clarify the legal boundaries imposed by § 13 Abs. 1 Satz 2 and § 14 Abs. 1 Satz 2 in conjunction with § 6 Abs. 1 KHEntgG on the arbitration board's fee-setting authority.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG; Legal limits on arbitration boards’ setting of hospital-specific daily fees under the Hospital Remuneration Act: The dispute concerned the statutory limits on the competence of a medical arbitration board (Schiedsstelle) when determining hospital-specific daily fees under the Hospital Remuneration Act. The decisive legal basis for the court's ruling is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which grants appeal permission due to the need to clarify the legal boundaries imposed by § 13 Abs. 1 Satz 2 and § 14 Abs. 1 Satz 2 in conjunction with § 6 Abs. 1 KHEntgG on the arbitration board's fee-setting authority.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
arbitrage limites légales honoraires d'avocat limites de la compétence autorité administrative motif de révision

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Legal basis for the main ground of the verdict, establishing that the case has fundamental significance and justifying the permission of the appeal on the merits.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
3 C 15/13
Eligibility of patient-crossing quality management and training costs as hospital surcharge tasks under German hospital compensation law
3 B 28/18
Hospital supplementary remuneration approval: arbitrator’s discretion to rely on party submission without independent fact-finding
B 6 KA 4/09 R
Arbitration award on statutory health insurance remuneration: mandatory requirement to determine total expenditure volume and prevent exceedance when based on individual service fees
5 B 6.24
Remuneration calculation in arbitration proceedings and fee-relevant value of challenge to cost components
B 6 KA 21/11 R
Schiedsamt: Extrabudgetäre Vergütung von Beleg- und AOP-Leistungen sowie regionale Honorarverteilungsquoten im Rahmen des Gestaltungsspielraums

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Legal basis for the main ground of the verdict, establishing that the case has fundamental significance and justifying the permission of the appeal on the merits.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Grenzpräzisierung für Schiedsstellen bei Festsetzungen von Entgelten

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen hat Erfolg. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, die rechtlichen Grenzen zu präzisieren, denen die Schiedsstelle nach § 13 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 14 Abs. 1 Satz 2 des Krankenhausentgeltgesetzes (KHEntgG) bei der Entscheidung über die Festsetzung krankenhausindividueller tagesbezogener Entgelte gemäß § 6 Abs. 1 KHEntgG unterliegt.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.