Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
5 B 6/16, 5 B 6/16 (5 C 17/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:060916B5B6.16.0 Généré par l'IA

Compatibility of Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation § 17(7) with superior law

Numéro de cause 5 B 6/16, 5 B 6/16 (5 C 17/16)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted the plaintiff's revision and permitted the appeal, ruling that the legal issue possessed fundamental significance. The dispute concerned a challenge to the compatibility of § 17(7) sentence 1 of the Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation (NBhVO) of November 7, 2011, with superior law. The decisive legal basis for the decision is § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, which governs the admission of revision on grounds of fundamental legal significance, enabling the appellate court to examine whether the contested regulation on medical supplementary allowances aligns with higher-ranking legal norms.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Compatibility of Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation § 17(7) with superior law: The dispute concerned a challenge to the compatibility of § 17(7) sentence 1 of the Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation (NBhVO) of November 7, 2011, with superior law. The decisive legal basis for the decision is § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, which governs the admission of revision on grounds of fundamental legal significance, enabling the appellate court to examine whether the contested regulation on medical supplementary allowances aligns with higher-ranking legal norms.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
peine complémentaire motifs de révision recours contre des décisions administratives rapprochement des législations champ d'application matériel des règlements dispositions spéciales pour le Luxembourg

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Généré par l'IA
5 B 66/12
Validity of administrative application under the Compensation Law and scope of analogical application to the Investment Priority Act
2 B 94/09
Legality requirement for statutory delegation of official assistance cost-deduction flat rates and prohibition of retroactive annualization
IV ZR 85/20
Validity of Sanierungsgelder for capital-funded supplementary pension funds and scope of judicial review under § 315 BGB
9 B 71/11
Sufficiency of appeal justification referencing prior provisional orders and exclusion of objective legal arbitrariness from procedural error
4 C 23/13
Sanierungsrechtliche Ausgleichsbeträge: Anknüpfung der Festsetzungsfrist an formellen Abschluss statt Treu und Glauben

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Klärung der Frage, ob § 17 Abs. 7 Satz 1 der Niedersächsischen Beihilfeverordnung mit höherrangigem Recht in Einklang steht

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob die Bestimmung des § 17 Abs. 7 Satz 1 der Niedersächsischen Beihilfeverordnung (NBhVO) vom 7. November 2011 (Nds. GVBl. S. 372) mit höherrangigem Recht in Einklang steht.