Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
9 B 25/15, 9 B 25/15 (9 C 22/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:030915B9B25.15.0 Généré par l'IA

Infrastructure charges arising from step-by-step construction of public facilities and provisional measures

Numéro de cause 9 B 25/15, 9 B 25/15 (9 C 22/15)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) dismissed the defendant's appeal and granted leave for the appeal on points of law (Revision) to the higher court, holding that the defendant's position on the admissibility of the appeal was justified and the appeal against the admissibility decision was well-founded. The dispute concerns the legal consequences of the step-by-step construction of public infrastructure facilities, specifically including the implementation of provisional measures, and their impact on the calculation of infrastructure charges (Erschließungsbeiträge). The court authorized the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO due to the fundamental importance of the case, allowing the Senate to clarify the relevant legal issues, while setting the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings pursuant to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 3, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Infrastructure charges arising from step-by-step construction of public facilities and provisional measures: The dispute concerns the legal consequences of the step-by-step construction of public infrastructure facilities, specifically including the implementation of provisional measures, and their impact on the calculation of infrastructure charges (Erschließungsbeiträge). The court authorized the appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO due to the fundamental importance of the case, allowing the Senate to clarify the relevant legal issues, while setting the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings pursuant to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 3, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
mesures provisoires coût de la construction procédure de révision travaux publics mise des frais de procédure amende pour infraction aux règles de bâtir

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, as the court explicitly grants leave for the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental importance of the case.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited to determine the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
9 B 27/15, 9 B 27/15 (9 C 24/15)
Subdivision charges triggered by step-by-step construction of access facilities and provisional measures
9 B 26/15, 9 B 26/15 (9 C 23/15)
Infrastructure contribution consequences of step-by-step facility construction and provisional measures
9 B 23/15, 9 B 23/15 (9 C 20/15)
Contribution liability for staged infrastructure completion and provisional measures
9 B 24/15, 9 B 24/15 (9 C 21/15)
Consequences of phased construction of development facilities and provisional measures on contribution levies
9 C 9/18
Erschließungsbeitrag: fragmentation of unified infrastructure into chargeable segments due to non-buildable access restrictions and non-essential parking

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, as the court explicitly grants leave for the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental importance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited to determine the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; schrittweise Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage; provisorische Maßnahmen

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der erschließungsbeitragsrechtlichen Folgen einer schrittweisen Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage einschließlich der damit einhergehenden Durchführung provisorischer Maßnahmen geben.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.