Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
9 B 27/15, 9 B 27/15 (9 C 24/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:030915B9B27.15.0 Généré par l'IA

Subdivision charges triggered by step-by-step construction of access facilities and provisional measures

Numéro de cause 9 B 27/15, 9 B 27/15 (9 C 24/15)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court allowed an appeal on points of law, granting the defendant (defendant-landowner) a successful challenge to the lower court's denial of such permission, thereby paving the way for a full review of the case by the senior senate. The dispute concerned whether a step-by-step construction of an access facility, involving the simultaneous implementation of provisional measures, could trigger immediate liability for subdivision charges. The court based its decision on the principle of "basic significance" under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, holding that the subdivision charge implications of phased infrastructure development and the legal status of interim measures remain unclear and require clarification by the appellate panel.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; Subdivision charges triggered by step-by-step construction of access facilities and provisional measures: The dispute concerned whether a step-by-step construction of an access facility, involving the simultaneous implementation of provisional measures, could trigger immediate liability for subdivision charges. The court based its decision on the principle of "basic significance" under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, holding that the subdivision charge implications of phased infrastructure development and the legal status of interim measures remain unclear and require clarification by the appellate panel.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
mesures provisoires contributions d'équipement recours contre des décisions administratives fondement de la responsabilité droit d'accès aux droits réels fractionnement

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for granting leave to file an appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rule cited for the calculation of court fees based on the determined amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG
Procedural rule used in conjunction with § 47 GKG to determine the amount in dispute.
Généré par l'IA
9 B 25/15, 9 B 25/15 (9 C 22/15)
Infrastructure charges arising from step-by-step construction of public facilities and provisional measures
9 B 24/15, 9 B 24/15 (9 C 21/15)
Consequences of phased construction of development facilities and provisional measures on contribution levies
9 B 26/15, 9 B 26/15 (9 C 23/15)
Infrastructure contribution consequences of step-by-step facility construction and provisional measures
9 B 23/15, 9 B 23/15 (9 C 20/15)
Contribution liability for staged infrastructure completion and provisional measures
9 C 9/18
Erschließungsbeitrag: fragmentation of unified infrastructure into chargeable segments due to non-buildable access restrictions and non-essential parking

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for granting leave to file an appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG

Procedural rule used in conjunction with § 47 GKG to determine the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rule cited for the calculation of court fees based on the determined amount in dispute.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; schrittweise Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage; provisorische Maßnahmen

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der erschließungsbeitragsrechtlichen Folgen einer schrittweisen Herstellung einer Erschließungsanlage einschließlich der damit einhergehenden Durchführung provisorischer Maßnahmen geben.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.