Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
7 B 20/14, 7 B 20/14 (7 C 2/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:280115B7B20.14.0 Généré par l'IA

Admissibility of revision on the exclusion grounds and scope of application of the Freedom of Information Act (IFG)

Numéro de cause 7 B 20/14, 7 B 20/14 (7 C 2/15)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's complaint, overturning the lower court's refusal to admit an appeal (Revision), thereby allowing the case to proceed to the appellate level. The dispute concerned a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act (IFG), specifically challenging the applicability of exclusion grounds and the scope of the law's informational duties. The Court determined that the case possessed fundamental legal significance pursuant to § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO because it would provide an opportunity to clarify the prerequisites for the exclusion grounds under §§ 5 and 6 IFG and the scope of application of § 7 Abs. 2 Satz 1 IFG.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 3 GKG; Admissibility of revision on the exclusion grounds and scope of application of the Freedom of Information Act (IFG): The dispute concerned a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act (IFG), specifically challenging the applicability of exclusion grounds and the scope of the law's informational duties. The Court determined that the case possessed fundamental legal significance pursuant to § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO because it would provide an opportunity to clarify the prerequisites for the exclusion grounds under §§ 5 and 6 IFG and the scope of application of § 7 Abs. 2 Satz 1 IFG.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
liberté d'information motifs de révision règles procédurales causes d'exclusion réclamation administrative État de droit

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting the complaint as the case has fundamental legal significance.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in both the complaint and revision proceedings.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 3 GKG
Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
7 B 29/18, 7 B 29/18 (7 C 5/19)
Admissibility of appeal based on fundamental significance of determining when Freedom of Information Act requests constitute abuse of rights
7 B 6/17, 7 B 6/17 (7 C 29/17)
Scope of exclusion grounds and requirement of a final administrative act for free access to information under VIG
1 B 58/16, 1 B 58/16 (1 C 18/16)
Admissibility of Revision: Interpreting Interplay Between §§ 26a and 27a AsylG
7 B 5/18
Freedom of information access to litigation documents and procedural error in fact-finding based on file cross-references
IX B 67/12
Scope of right to inspect court files and admissibility of revision based on mere disagreement with factual assessment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting the complaint as the case has fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 3 GKG

Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in both the complaint and revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Ausschlussgründe und Anwendungsbereich des IFG

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem angefochtenen Urteil ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Das Revisionsverfahren kann dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, sich zu den Voraussetzungen der Ausschlussgründe nach den §§ 5, 6 IFG und zum Anwendungsbereich des § 7 Abs. 2 Satz 1 IFG zu verhalten.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.