Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
7 B 4/14, 7 B 4/14 (7 C 1/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:050115B7B4.14.0 Généré par l'IA

Compatibility of statutory exclusion of environmental objections with EU law

Numéro de cause 7 B 4/14, 7 B 4/14 (7 C 1/15)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court dismissed the defendant’s opposition and granted leave to appeal the lower court’s judgment, allowing the plaintiff to pursue the revision. The case concerned a dispute under environmental law where the plaintiff challenged the finality of the administrative act based on a procedural defect. The court held that the case had fundamental significance because it required clarification on whether the statutory exclusion of objections in German environmental law is compatible with European Union law. The decision is grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO (federal administrative procedure code) and addresses the compatibility of § 10 Abs. 3 Satz 5 BImSchG (Federal Immission Control Act) and § 2 Abs. 3 UmwRG (Environmental Remediation Act) with EU law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Compatibility of statutory exclusion of environmental objections with EU law: The case concerned a dispute under environmental law where the plaintiff challenged the finality of the administrative act based on a procedural defect. The court held that the case had fundamental significance because it required clarification on whether the statutory exclusion of objections in German environmental law is compatible with European Union law. The decision is grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO (federal administrative procedure code) and addresses the compatibility of § 10 Abs. 3 Satz 5 BImSchG (Federal Immission Control Act) and § 2 Abs. 3 UmwRG (Environmental Remediation Act) with EU law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
motif légal d'exclusion griefs de procédure motifs de révision norme environnementale acte de procédure recours du personnel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provisions determining the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Provisions determining the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
7 B 19/14, 7 B 19/14 (7 C 17/15)
Compatibility of the Saarland exclusion of objections in administrative proceedings with EU law
7 B 26/09, 7 B 26/09 (7 C 1/10)
Temporal transition of Environmental Legal Remedies Act exclusion rules and compatibility with EU Community law
7 C 1/15
Preclusion of public association objections in environmental permitting is incompatible with EU directives; standing excludes post-permit conditions and start-up extensions
4 BN 40/15, 4 BN 40/15 (4 CN 3/16)
Compatibility of the one-year exclusion period for challenging violations of the inter-municipal consultation duty in German building law with Union law
4 CN 3/16
Conflict between EU EIA Directive access to justice and German land-use plan statutory notice defect waiver periods

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provisions determining the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Provisions determining the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Einwendungsausschluss

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem angefochtenen Urteil ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie wirft die erneut klärungsbedürftige Frage auf, ob die Bestimmungen über den Ausschluss von Einwendungen in § 10 Abs. 3 Satz 5 BImSchG und § 2 Abs. 3 UmwRG mit dem Recht der Europäischen Union vereinbar sind.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.