Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvR 671/26 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2026:rk20260427.2bvr067126 Généré par l'IA

Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint for failure to substantiate potential fundamental rights violation under BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 2 BvR 671/26
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate, First Chamber) dismissed the applicant’s request for a provisional order (einstweilige Anordnung) in a constitutional complaint proceeding, with the decision being final and unappealable. The case involved a complaint where the applicant failed to substantiate that the underlying constitutional complaint was neither inadmissible nor manifestly unfounded, specifically lacking a demonstration of a possible violation of the identified fundamental rights. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the failure to meet the substantive disclosure requirements of § 23 para. 1 sentence 2 and § 92 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which mandate a specific showing of the potential for a rights violation to justify interim relief.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG, § 92 BVerfGG; Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint for failure to substantiate potential fundamental rights violation under BVerfGG: The case involved a complaint where the applicant failed to substantiate that the underlying constitutional complaint was neither inadmissible nor manifestly unfounded, specifically lacking a demonstration of a possible violation of the identified fundamental rights. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the failure to meet the substantive disclosure requirements of § 23 para. 1 sentence 2 and § 92 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which mandate a specific showing of the potential for a rights violation to justify interim relief.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
référé motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels droits fondamentaux procédure préjudicielle d'urgence aide d'urgence constitutionnelle défaut de conditions matérielles

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Cited as the procedural requirement for the substantive justification of a constitutional complaint, which the applicant failed to meet.
§ 92 BVerfGG
Cited as the procedural standard requiring the applicant to demonstrate a possible violation of fundamental rights to justify the interim order.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 99, 84
BVerfGE 99, 84 m.w.N.;BVerfG, Beschluss der 2.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 87/17
Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint due to insufficient substantiation of fundamental rights violations and failure to engage with the challenged judgment
1 BvQ 66/17
Denial of interim relief due to manifest lack of substantiation of constitutional complaint
1 BvQ 14/15
Interim relief for constitutional complaint rejected due to failure to meet § 23 BVerfGG substantiation requirements
1 BvQ 61/19
Interim relief denied where pending constitutional complaint lacks exhausted remedies and substantive reasoning
2 BvQ 101/18
Constitutional interim relief denied for failure to substantiate the principle of subsidiarity of constitutional complaints

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Cited as the procedural requirement for the substantive justification of a constitutional complaint, which the applicant failed to meet.

§ 92 BVerfGG

Cited as the procedural standard requiring the applicant to demonstrate a possible violation of fundamental rights to justify the interim order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Erfolgloser Eilantrag im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren: Unzureichende Darlegung der Möglichkeit einer Grundrechtsverletzung

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.

Der Beschwerdeführer hat nicht substantiiert dargelegt, dass die Verfassungsbeschwerde nach derzeitigem Stand weder von vornherein unzulässig noch offensichtlich unbegründet ist (vgl. BVerfGE 99, 84 m.w.N.;BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 20. August 2015 - 1 BvQ 28/15 -, Rn. 2; Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 30. September 2015 - 2 BvQ 29/15 -, Rn. 2; stRspr). Er hat die Möglichkeit einer Verletzung der von ihm bezeichneten Grundrechte nicht in einer den Anforderungen der § 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2, § 92 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz entsprechenden Weise aufgezeigt.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.