Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvC 42/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2024:cs20241212.2bvc004219 Généré par l'IA

Mootness of election scrutiny complaint alleging equal and direct voting violations in amended Federal Election Act

Numéro de cause 2 BvC 42/19
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate) declared the election scrutiny complaint moot and ceased to provide a substantive written justification, thereby effectively leaving the challenged legislative act in force without a ruling on the merits. The dispute concerned a challenge to alleged violations of the constitutional principles of equal and direct elections under the Federal Election Act, which the complainant argued persisted despite a subsequent amendment to the law. The Court determined that the matter had rendered itself obsolete for the reasons identified in a prior reporter’s letter dated October 22, 2024, and found that the complainant’s arguments did not call into question the Senate’s earlier decision of July 30, 2024 (Case 2 BvF 1/23 et seq.); consequently, pursuant to § 24 Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), the Court dispensed with further written reasoning.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Mootness of election scrutiny complaint alleging equal and direct voting violations in amended Federal Election Act: The dispute concerned a challenge to alleged violations of the constitutional principles of equal and direct elections under the Federal Election Act, which the complainant argued persisted despite a subsequent amendment to the law. The Court determined that the matter had rendered itself obsolete for the reasons identified in a prior reporter’s letter dated October 22, 2024, and found that the complainant’s arguments did not call into question the Senate’s earlier decision of July 30, 2024 (Case 2 BvF 1/23 et seq.); consequently, pursuant to § 24 Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), the Court dispensed with further written reasoning.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
objet du litige scrutin direct modification législative fraude électorale argumentation sur le fond motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a further written reasoning.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
2 BvF 1/23
German federal election law: 5% threshold without direct-mandate exemption and second-vote offset system under Art. 38(1), Art. 21(1) GG
Généré par l'IA
2 BvC 11/24
Election scrutiny: Dismissal of complaint without further reasoning under § 24 Sentence 2 BVerfGG
2 BvC 30/23
Constitutional validity of Federal Electoral Law amendment regarding election review procedure
2 BvC 26/22
Election scrutiny complaint: waiver of written reasoning via rapporteur letter under § 24 BVerfGG
2 BvC 40/14
Threshold dismissal of election scrutiny complaint for failure to meet substantive challenge requirements
2 BvC 25/23
Recusal motion and election review complaint: Inadmissibility of bias claims based on prior reports and partial mootness of statutory challenge

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a further written reasoning.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Verwerfung (a-limine-Abweisung) einer Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde unter Hinweis auf das Berichterstatterschreiben

[TENOR]

Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde hat sich erledigt.

[GRUENDE]

Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde hat sich aus den in dem Schreiben der Berichterstatterin vom 22. Oktober 2024 genannten Gründen erledigt. Soweit der Beschwerdeführer geltend macht, die von ihm gerügten Verletzungen der Grundsätze der gleichen und unmittelbaren Wahl beträfen auch das zwischenzeitlich geänderte Bundeswahlgesetz, stellen seine Ausführungen die Entscheidung des Senats mit Urteil vom 30. Juli 2024 - 2 BvF 1/23 u.a. - nicht in Frage. Gemäß § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung abgesehen.