Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvQ 15/24 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2024:qk20240312.2bvq001524 Généré par l'IA

Emergency relief for prisoner to initiate parole preparation: failure to substantiate severe disadvantage and subsidiarity

Numéro de cause 2 BvQ 15/24
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the application for a temporary injunction and denied legal aid, leaving the respondent's position prevailing as the applicant's immediate relief was refused. The dispute involved a criminal prisoner seeking an order to initiate parole preparation measures, which the court found procedurally deficient. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the applicant's failure to substantiate that a severe disadvantage threatened absent the injunction and the failure to demonstrate compliance with the principle of subsidiarity by exhausting other legal remedies, while legal aid was denied due to the lack of a sufficient prospect of success in the intended proceedings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

BVerfGE 156, 335, 160, 191, 2 BvQ 1/24, BVerfGE 86, 46, 2 BvQ 24/16; Emergency relief for prisoner to initiate parole preparation: failure to substantiate severe disadvantage and subsidiarity: The dispute involved a criminal prisoner seeking an order to initiate parole preparation measures, which the court found procedurally deficient. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the applicant's failure to substantiate that a severe disadvantage threatened absent the injunction and the failure to demonstrate compliance with the principle of subsidiarity by exhausting other legal remedies, while legal aid was denied due to the lack of a sufficient prospect of success in the intended proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
aide d'urgence constitutionnelle procédure d'assistance judiciaire licenciement avec effet immédiat menace en droit pénal détenu principe de subsidiarité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 156, 335
Cited as authority for the requirement that the applicant must substantiate a threat of severe disadvantage for a temporary injunction.
160, 191
Cited as authority for the requirement that the applicant must substantiate a threat of severe disadvantage for a temporary injunction.
2 BvQ 1/24
Cited for requirements regarding the threat of severe disadvantage and the principle of subsidiarity in the context of emergency applications.
BVerfGE 86, 46
Cited as the legal basis for the requirement of compliance with the principle of subsidiarity.
2 BvQ 24/16
Cited for the requirement of compliance with the principle of subsidiarity.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 156, 335
BVerfGE 156, 335 - Eilentscheidung zum Staatsvertrag Rundfunkfinanzierung; 160, 191 - 2G+-Regel bei Gedenkstunde des Deutschen Bundestages - eA; BVerfG, Beschluss der 1.
BVerfGE 86, 46
BVerfGE 86, 46 ; BVerfG, Beschluss der 2.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 336/20
Interim relief for prison sentence suspension rejected due to failure to demonstrate severe disadvantage despite extended prison leave
2 BvQ 29/15
Rejection of interim injunction for lack of substantiated admissibility of constitutional complaint and failure to exhaust subsidiarity through lower-court emergency relief
2 BvQ 38/14
Denial of interim relief for lack of prior exhaustion of legal remedies and absence of severe disadvantage in prison disciplinary proceedings
2 BvQ 4/18
Interim relief refused for parole suspension due to non-exhaustion of ordinary appellate proceedings
2 BvQ 24/16
Interim order in criminal execution: Subsidiarity to specialized judicial emergency relief

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
BVerfGE 156, 335

Cited as authority for the requirement that the applicant must substantiate a threat of severe disadvantage for a temporary injunction.

160, 191

Cited as authority for the requirement that the applicant must substantiate a threat of severe disadvantage for a temporary injunction.

2 BvQ 1/24

Cited for requirements regarding the threat of severe disadvantage and the principle of subsidiarity in the context of emergency applications.

BVerfGE 86, 46

Cited as the legal basis for the requirement of compliance with the principle of subsidiarity.

2 BvQ 24/16

Cited for the requirement of compliance with the principle of subsidiarity.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Erfolgloser Eilantrag eines Strafgefangenen zur Einleitung von Entlassungsvorbereitungen - Tenorbegründung

[TENOR]

1. Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt, weil der Antragsteller nicht substantiiert und nachvollziehbar dargelegt hat, dass ihm für den Fall, dass die beantragte einstweilige Anordnung nicht erlassen wird, ein schwerer Nachteil droht (vgl. BVerfGE 156, 335 - Eilentscheidung zum Staatsvertrag Rundfunkfinanzierung; 160, 191 - 2G+-Regel bei Gedenkstunde des Deutschen Bundestages - eA; BVerfG, Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 15. Januar 2024 - 1 BvQ 1/24 -, Rn. 22). Zudem ist nicht dargetan, dass der Grundsatz der Subsidiarität gewahrt worden ist (vgl. BVerfGE 86, 46 ; BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 19. Mai 2016 - 2 BvQ 24/16 -, Rn. 2; Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 15. Januar 2024 - 1 BvQ 1/24 -, Rn. 23).

2. Der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und Beiordnung der Rechtsanwältin (…) für das Verfahren der einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt, weil die beabsichtigte Rechtsverfolgung keine hinreichende Aussicht auf Erfolg bietet.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.