Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvQ 95/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:qk20211020a.2bvq009521 Généré par l'IA

Interim injunction in immigration proceedings: statutory omission of reasoning under § 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 2 BvQ 95/21
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court’s Second Senate, Second Chamber, dismissed the application for a temporary injunction (einstweilige Anordnung) without providing a substantive reasoning in the operative order, thereby upholding the status quo for the opposing party. The case involved an immigration law matter (ausländerrechtliche Sache) where the applicant sought urgent interim protection against a measure from prior proceedings. The decision was issued as a final, unchallengeable order, and in accordance with § 32 Abs. 5 S. 1 BVerfGG, the Court stated that a separate, detailed written justification for the dismissal would be transmitted to the parties.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG, § 32 Abs. 5 S 1 BVerfGG; Interim injunction in immigration proceedings: statutory omission of reasoning under § 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG: The case involved an immigration law matter (ausländerrechtliche Sache) where the applicant sought urgent interim protection against a measure from prior proceedings. The decision was issued as a final, unchallengeable order, and in accordance with § 32 Abs. 5 S. 1 BVerfGG, the Court stated that a separate, detailed written justification for the dismissal would be transmitted to the parties.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
mesure provisionnelle protection provisoire bien-fondé matériel détention en droit des étrangers protection contre les congés interdiction de l'expulsion des nationaux

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for transmitting a separate, detailed written justification later.
§ 32 Abs. 5 S 1 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive to justify the immediate communication of the decision without a substantive reasoning.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvQ 24/18
Interim injunction for deportation: insufficient substantiation of Art. 6 GG family interference and unexhausted ordinary legal remedies
2 BvQ 55/22
Inadmissibility of interim relief in criminal proceedings for lack of substantiation on merits prospects
1 BvQ 4/17
Interim relief in expulsion proceedings: inadmissibility due to unexhausted ordinary legal remedies and lack of substantiation
2 BvQ 26/18
Interim relief under § 32 BVerfGG: Inadmissibility due to insufficient substantiation of prerequisites
2 BvQ 63/22
Constitutional complaint for interim relief rejected due to insufficient substantiation of § 32(1) BVerfGG requirements

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 S 1 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive to justify the immediate communication of the decision without a substantive reasoning.

§ 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for transmitting a separate, detailed written justification later.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Ablehnung einer einstweiligen Anordnung in einer ausländerrechtlichen Sache - Bekanntgabe der Entscheidung ohne Begründung (§ 32 Abs 5 S 1 BVerfGG)

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.

Eine Begründung des Beschlusses wird gesondert übermittelt (§ 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG).

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.