Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvQ 48/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:qk20210417.1bvq004821 Généré par l'IA

Constitutional complaint against assembly ban; insufficient substantiation of urgent interim relief requirements

Numéro de cause 1 BvQ 48/21
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court denied the applicant's urgent application for an interim order, meaning the challenged assembly ban remains in force and the applicant prevailed in no respect. The dispute concerned a request for urgent relief to annul a prohibition of a public assembly, where the applicant sought to halt the ban's enforcement pending a final decision. The court rejected the motion solely on procedural grounds, holding that the applicant failed to adequately substantiate the prerequisites for an interim order as required by § 32 Abs. 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), rendering the decision final and unappealable.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint against assembly ban; insufficient substantiation of urgent interim relief requirements: The dispute concerned a request for urgent relief to annul a prohibition of a public assembly, where the applicant sought to halt the ban's enforcement pending a final decision. The court rejected the motion solely on procedural grounds, holding that the applicant failed to adequately substantiate the prerequisites for an interim order as required by § 32 Abs. 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), rendering the decision final and unappealable.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
exigence constitutionnelle référé motif de police autorisation d'exécution exception d'inconstitutionnalité procédure préjudicielle d'urgence

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for rejecting the application for an interim order due to insufficient substantiation of the legal prerequisites.
Généré par l'IA
1 BvR 1005/20
Constitutional complaint challenging a public assembly ban: denial of interim relief due to failure to exhaust administrative court emergency remedies
1 BvQ 130/20
Constitutional interim relief against assembly ban denied for failure to exhaust administrative court remedies
1 BvQ 147/20
Interim relief against assembly ban: sufficiency of substantiation under § 32(1) BVerfGG
1 BvR 742/20
Rejection of interim relief for assembly ban due to lack of demonstrated ongoing legal interest after partial passage of event duration
1 BvQ 27/20
Denial of interim assembly exemption due to unresolved administrative judicial remedy

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive as the basis for rejecting the application for an interim order due to insufficient substantiation of the legal prerequisites.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Erfolgloser Eilantrag auf Aufhebung eines Versammlungsverbots - Voraussetzungen für Erlass einer eA nicht hinreichend dargelegt - Tenorbegründung

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt, weil die Voraussetzungen des § 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG vom Antragsteller nicht ausreichend dargetan sind.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.