Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 BvC 49/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:cs20201119.2bvc004919 Généré par l'IA

Validity of 2019 European Parliament election and waiver of reasoned judgment under § 24(2) BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 2 BvC 49/19
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed a complaint against the 2019 European Parliament election, finding the complaint devoid of merit and refusing to provide a detailed written justification pursuant to § 24 Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), thereby upholding the election results. The dispute involved a constitutional challenge (Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde) alleging defects in the conduct or validity of the European Parliament election, which the court rejected based on the reasons articulated in a prior report by the rapporter. The decision relied on § 26(3) Sentence 3 of the Act on the European Election Campaigns (EuWG) and § 24 Sentence 2 BVerfGG to permit the dismissal without further reasoning, resulting in the complete rejection of the applicant's claims.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG, § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG; Validity of 2019 European Parliament election and waiver of reasoned judgment under § 24(2) BVerfGG: The dispute involved a constitutional challenge (Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde) alleging defects in the conduct or validity of the European Parliament election, which the court rejected based on the reasons articulated in a prior report by the rapporter. The decision relied on § 26(3) Sentence 3 of the Act on the European Election Campaigns (EuWG) and § 24 Sentence 2 BVerfGG to permit the dismissal without further reasoning, resulting in the complete rejection of the applicant's claims.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du scrutin élection européenne recours constitutionnel à l'étranger procédure législative ordinaire décision motivée antécédents

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural provision cited in the operative order to allow the omission of a detailed written justification in the decision.
§ 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG
Procedural provision cited in the operative order to justify dismissing the election complaint without further substantive reasoning by reference to the rapporteur's letter.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvC 59/14
Election validity challenge; waiver of reasoned decision on election review complaint
2 BvC 63/19
Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde against European Parliament election results dismissed a-limine via § 24(2) BVerfGG without substantive review
2 BvC 16/20
Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde against European Parliament elections rejected as unfounded without substantive reasoning
2 BvC 9/15
Election validity review; waiver of written reasoning under § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG in conjunction with § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG
2 BvC 24/14
Election validity challenge and waiver of reasoned judgment under § 24(2) BVerfGG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG

Procedural provision cited in the operative order to justify dismissing the election complaint without further substantive reasoning by reference to the rapporteur's letter.

§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural provision cited in the operative order to allow the omission of a detailed written justification in the decision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Verwerfung (A-limine-Abweisung) einer Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde, gerichtet gegen die Europawahl 2019 - Absehen von weiterer Begründung unter Bezugnahme auf Berichterstatterschreiben (§ 24 S 2 BVerfGG)

[TENOR]

Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde wird verworfen.

[GRUENDE]

Der Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde bleibt aus den in dem Schreiben des Berichterstatters vom 10. September 2020 genannten Gründen der Erfolg versagt. Gemäß § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 3 EuWG, § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung abgesehen.