Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 371/11 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2011:rk20111206.1bvr037111 Généré par l'IA

Legal aid eligibility and admissibility of constitutional complaint by co-complainants under § 93d BVerfGG

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 371/11
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court granted legal aid and appointed counsel for the first complainant, while denying legal aid and refusing to accept the constitutional complaint of the second complainant for lack of prospects of success, rendering the decision final and unappealable. The case involved a dual request for legal aid and court-appointed attorney in a constitutional complaint proceeding, where the court distinguished between the two complainants based on the merits of their respective claims. The decisive legal basis was Section 93d Paragraph 1 Sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits the court to forgo providing a detailed reasoning when dismissing a constitutional complaint as manifestly unfounded, alongside the general standards for granting procedural legal aid only where the underlying constitutional claim offers sufficient prospects of success.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Legal aid eligibility and admissibility of constitutional complaint by co-complainants under § 93d BVerfGG: The case involved a dual request for legal aid and court-appointed attorney in a constitutional complaint proceeding, where the court distinguished between the two complainants based on the merits of their respective claims. The decisive legal basis was Section 93d Paragraph 1 Sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits the court to forgo providing a detailed reasoning when dismissing a constitutional complaint as manifestly unfounded, alongside the general standards for granting procedural legal aid only where the underlying constitutional claim offers sufficient prospects of success.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procédure d'assistance judiciaire assistance d'un avocat d'office motivation insuffisante des griefs constitutionnels aide d'urgence constitutionnelle acte de procédure entraide administrative

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a further legal reasoning for the non-acceptance of the second complainant's constitutional complaint.
Généré par l'IA
2 BvR 2380/17
Denial of legal aid in constitutional complaint: Admissibility requirements for a specific act of authority and substantive rights-violation justification
1 BvR 2867/11
Eligibility for legal aid in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 367/20
Constitutional complaint against non-acceptance of denial of procedural legal aid in civil proceedings
1 BvR 2410/17
Denial of legal aid for constitutional complaint due to failure to substantiate prospects of success regarding fundamental rights violations
1 BvR 684/22
Denial of legal aid and constitutional complaint for failure to demonstrate prospect of success in constitutional review

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a further legal reasoning for the non-acceptance of the second complainant's constitutional complaint.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

PKH-Bewilligung und Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts, beschränkt auf einen von zwei Beschwerdeführern - Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde des weiteren Beschwerdeführers

[TENOR]

Dem Beschwerdeführer zu 1) wird auf seinen Antrag Prozesskostenhilfe ohne Ratenzahlung für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren

bewilligt und Rechtsanwältin S. zur Wahrung seiner Rechte beigeordnet.

Der Antrag des Beschwerdeführers zu 2) auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und Beiordnung einer Rechtsanwältin wird abgelehnt,

da die Verfassungsbeschwerde insoweit keine hinreichende Aussicht auf Erfolg bietet.

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde des Beschwerdeführers zu 2) wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, da sie unbegründet ist.Von einer weiteren Begründung wird insoweit nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.