Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
1 BvR 780/09 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2011:rk20110517.1bvr078009 Généré par l'IA

Refusal to disclose domestic intelligence records

Numéro de cause 1 BvR 780/09
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the decision final and unchallengeable without providing a substantive reasoning, as permitted under § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act. The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint challenging the refusal to disclose information from domestic intelligence (Verfassungsschutz) files. The decisive legal basis for the procedural outcome was the court's discretionary power to decline jurisdiction over the case without a written explanation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Refusal to disclose domestic intelligence records: The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint challenging the refusal to disclose information from domestic intelligence (Verfassungsschutz) files. The decisive legal basis for the procedural outcome was the court's discretionary power to decline jurisdiction over the case without a written explanation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
juridiction constitutionnelle droit de refuser de témoigner liberté d'information violation de secrets militaires pouvoir de décision grief de violation constitutionnelle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive to justify the decision to refrain from providing a written reasoning for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.
Généré par l'IA
6 B 26/22
Refusal of constitutional protection data disclosure: evidentiary sufficiency for § 15 Abs. 2 BVerfSchG danger to sources
6 B 28/22
Insufficiency of reasoning for refusing BVerfSchG information request due to risk of source endangerment and operational exposure.
6 B 29/22
BVerfSchG § 15 information refusal based on source endangerment and state secrets: sufficiency of evidence and no need for file inspection in non-admission of revision complaint
20 F 8/09
Scope of § 99 VwGO disclosure refusal: balancing security agency source protection and operational secrecy against plaintiff's right to data access.
20 F 7/09
Refusal to disclose files: balancing security interests and plaintiff's access to constitutional protection office records under § 99 VwGO

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive to justify the decision to refrain from providing a written reasoning for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Verweigerung der Auskunft aus Verfassungsschutzakten

[TENOR] Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Von einer Begründung wird gemäß § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.