Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
30 09 18 • KG LU 30 09 18 Généré par l'IA

Guardianship Authority Obligation in Contested Assistant Appointment

Numéro de cause 30 09 18
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

In a dispute between unmarried parents regarding the appointment of a guardian or assistant for their child following the establishment of an upbringing assistance measure, the higher court overturned the decision of the higher administrative authority that had substituted the initial appointment. The court reasoned that when the parents propose different candidates for the assistant role, the guardianship authority is legally obligated, according to relevant civil code articles, to appoint an independent and neutral person, as the role requires a neutral third party to mediate visitation issues, and it is not proper for a supervisory authority to make the new appointment directly upon finding error, but rather to refer the matter back to the initial authority for a fresh selection.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

Art. 379 Abs. 1, 381 und 397 ZGB. Weichen die Vorschläge der Eltern in Bezug auf die Wahl des Vormunds bzw. Beistands voneinander ab, hat die Vormundschaftsbehörde eine unabhängige, neutrale Person zu ernennen. | Familienrecht

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
nomination d'un curateur autorité administrative objet du litige personnes non mariées responsabilité parentale obligation accessoire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 379 Abs. 1 ZGB
Cited in the decision's operative part concerning the authority's duty to choose a suitable guardian/assistant.
Art. 397 ZGB
Cited in the decision's operative part as a cross-reference related to the appointment process.
Art. 308 ZGB
Art. 379 ZGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 379 Abs.
Art. 381 ZGB
Cited in the decision's operative part regarding respecting parental suggestions for the appointment.
Art. 308 Abs. 2 ZGB
Art. 388 ZGB
Art. 6 EMRK

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 107 II 504
Mother's Appeal Against Guardian Appointment Dismissed Due to Lack of Standing
Généré par l'IA
30 00 13
Guardianship Appointment Without Considering Affected Parties' Wishes
30 99 2
Guardianship Appointment Challenge Jurisdiction
RRE Nr 381
Appointment of Guardian Due to Conflict of Interest in Estate Inheritance
3H 17 36
Child Protection Guardian Appointment vs. Party Nomination Preferences

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 379 Abs. 1 ZGB

Cited in the decision's operative part concerning the authority's duty to choose a suitable guardian/assistant.

Art. 381 ZGB

Cited in the decision's operative part regarding respecting parental suggestions for the appointment.

Art. 397 ZGB

Cited in the decision's operative part as a cross-reference related to the appointment process.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 03.12.2009

Fallnummer: · 30 09 18

LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 5

Leitsatz: · Art. 379 Abs. 1, 381 und 397 ZGB. Weichen die Vorschläge der Eltern in Bezug auf die Wahl des Vormunds bzw. Beistands voneinander ab, hat die Vormundschaftsbehörde eine unabhängige, neutrale Person zu ernennen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.