Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
11 10 179 • KG LU 11 10 179 Généré par l'IA

Oral Modification of Written Wage Criteria in Employment Contract

Numéro de cause 11 10 179
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned whether pre-agreed written criteria for calculating wages, established within an employment contract, could be subsequently modified by a later oral agreement, despite a contractual stipulation for written form regarding these criteria. The lower court dismissed the claim because it deemed the written form requirement applicable to amendments, thus refusing to examine the alleged oral modification. The appellate court overturned this, reasoning that while the written form was agreed upon for setting the initial performance targets, a claim regarding a subsequent modification of an established wage claim cannot be rendered inadmissible based on the lack of written form for the modification itself, as the underlying wage claim is of mandatory nature; therefore, the initial written agreement on criteria serves merely as proof, and the party asserting a subsequent oral change must be permitted to provide evidence for that later agreement.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

Art. 12, 16 Abs. 1 und 322 Abs. 1 OR. Zulässigkeit der Abänderung von vertragsgemäss in Schriftform vereinbarten Lohnbemessungskriterien durch eine nachträgliche mündliche Abrede. | Zivilrecht

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrats de travail modification de la demande fixation du salaire convention d'objectifs renonciation à des prétentions de salaire interprétation complétive du contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 40 II 614
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 322 Abs. 1 OR

This provision is cited in the reasoning that leads to the decision that the Lohnanspruch must be measured based on the proven criteria.

Art. 16 Abs. 1 OR

This provision was discussed in relation to the applicability of form requirements for subsequent agreements, although the court found the Vorinstanz's application incorrect.

Art. 12 OR

This provision was discussed regarding the principle that stipulated form requirements do not apply against mandatory law or subsequent agreements regarding contract content.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · 1. Abteilung

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 14.03.2011

Fallnummer: · 11 10 179

LGVE: · 2011 I Nr. 16

Leitsatz: · Art. 12, 16 Abs. 1 und 322 Abs. 1 OR. Zulässigkeit der Abänderung von vertragsgemäss in Schriftform vereinbarten Lohnbemessungskriterien durch eine nachträgliche mündliche Abrede.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.