Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
11 09 105 • KG LU 11 09 105 Généré par l'IA

Interpretation of Divorce Agreement Cost-Sharing Clause

Numéro de cause 11 09 105
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court was asked to interpret a clause in a judicially approved divorce agreement where one party agreed to contribute half the moving and cleaning costs, up to a maximum of CHF 5,000. The court reasoned that a judicially approved divorce convention becomes an integral part of the judgment, and its interpretation, when it mandates a non-specified sum, should follow the rules for contract interpretation under Article 18 of the Code of Obligations, focusing on the objective meaning based on good faith, as the subjective intent was not proven. The court concluded that the phrasing "as a gesture of goodwill" and "without admission of legal obligation" did not negate the clear commitment to a half-share, especially given the explicit cost cap, thus affirming the lower court's decision to order payment of the claimed CHF 1,092.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 18 OR, Art. 18 Abs. 1 OR, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Interpretation of Divorce Agreement Cost-Sharing Clause: The court reasoned that a judicially approved divorce convention becomes an integral part of the judgment, and its interpretation, when it mandates a non-specified sum, should follow the rules for contract interpretation under Article 18 of the Code of Obligations, focusing on the objective meaning based on good faith, as the subjective intent was not proven. The court concluded that the phrasing "as a gesture of goodwill" and "without admission of legal obligation" did not negate the clear commitment to a half-share, especially given the explicit cost cap, thus affirming the lower court's decision to order payment of the claimed CHF 1,092.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation du contrat convention sur les effets accessoires du divorce obligation de loyauté moyen de paiement participation de l'assuré aux frais droit matrimonial

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 18 OR
The court analogously applied the interpretation rules of Art. 18 OR to the divorce agreement incorporated into the judgment as the basis for determining the actual obligation.
Art. 18 Abs. 1 OR
9 Leitsatz: · Art. 18 OR.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision would typically govern the allocation of costs, although the specific dispositive orders imposing costs are missing from the provided text excerpt.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 119 II 300
BGE 129 III 630
BGE 132 III 27
Généré par l'IA
22 06 80
Marital Contract Deemed Disguised Divorce Settlement Requiring Judicial Approval
22 00 27
Divorce Cost Allocation Overturned Based on Reconciliation Protocol Interpretation
22 02 100
Joint Divorce Petition Non-Confirmation Cost Allocation
3B 16 29
Appellate Court Upholds Divorce Based on Intent to Dissolve Legal Marriage Despite Financial Motivation
11 08 130
Suretyship Validity and Contractual Interpretation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 18 OR

The court analogously applied the interpretation rules of Art. 18 OR to the divorce agreement incorporated into the judgment as the basis for determining the actual obligation.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision would typically govern the allocation of costs, although the specific dispositive orders imposing costs are missing from the provided text excerpt.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht) Entscheiddatum: · 16.09.2009 Fallnummer: · 11 09 105 LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 9 Leitsatz: · Art. 18 OR. Auslegung einer gerichtlich genehmigten Scheidungsvereinbarung. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.