Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
11 08 132 • KG LU 11 08 132 Généré par l'IA

Debt Enforcement: Calculation of Newly Acquired Assets Based on Income and Living Expenses

Numéro de cause 11 08 132
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

In a debt enforcement dispute concerning the challenge of new assets acquired during a specific period, the court upheld the lower court's decision regarding the calculation of new wealth. The court reasoned that the debtor's full-time employment income, estimated at a net CHF 8,544 monthly based on witness testimony deemed more credible than evidence suggesting only part-time work, was established. Furthermore, the court rejected the debtor's attempts to deduct property maintenance costs using a tax-based lump sum allowance and to include undocumented support payments to family members when calculating necessary living expenses. Consequently, after subtracting the undisputed proportional share of reasonable living costs (CHF 3,529 monthly), the court confirmed that the debtor realized a surplus income of CHF 5,015 per month, totaling CHF 60,180 annually, which qualified as newly acquired assets, thus justifying the partial lifting of the objection to payment enforcement for that amount.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 265a Abs. 4 SchKG, Art. 265a Abs. 1 SchKG, Art. 265a SchKG, Art. 265 SchKG, Art. 319 OR, Art. 321 OR; Debt Enforcement: Calculation of Newly Acquired Assets Based on Income and Living Expenses: The court reasoned that the debtor's full-time employment income, estimated at a net CHF 8,544 monthly based on witness testimony deemed more credible than evidence suggesting only part-time work, was established. Furthermore, the court rejected the debtor's attempts to deduct property maintenance costs using a tax-based lump sum allowance and to include undocumented support payments to family members when calculating necessary living expenses. Consequently, after subtracting the undisputed proportional share of reasonable living costs (CHF 3,529 monthly), the court confirmed that the debtor realized a surplus income of CHF 5,015 per month, totaling CHF 60,180 annually, which qualified as newly acquired assets, thus justifying the partial lifting of the objection to payment enforcement for that amount.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
revenu de la fortune poursuite pour dettes frais de subsistance dette fiscale calcul des frais impôt sur la fortune

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 265a Abs. 4 SchKG

This article governs the right of either party to file a claim concerning the existence or non-existence of new assets in ordinary proceedings following a ruling on objection to a levy.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited implicitly as the decision addresses the allocation of costs, although the specific article citation is missing from the explicit dispositive section (which is usually concluded by a ruling on costs in appeal judgments, but here the outcome is stated based on the reasoning leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision).

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungsund Konkursrecht Entscheiddatum: · 13.02.2009 Fallnummer: · 11 08 132 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 265a Abs. 4 SchKG. Klage auf Bestreitung neuen Vermögens: Berechnung. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.