Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
11 07 125 • KG LU 11 07 125 Généré par l'IA

Property Use Agreement Termination and Conciliation Hearing Attendance

Numéro de cause 11 07 125
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

When parties to a dispute concerning a property use agreement appeared before a conciliation authority regarding the termination of the agreement and the refusal to sign a building application, and the defendants failed to appear at the conciliation hearing after raising a defense of the authority's lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, the court held that raising an objection of incompetence does not exempt parties from the procedural obligation to attend the conciliation hearing, as the resulting cost decision is merely a sanction for non-compliance with a procedural duty and not a final ruling on the merits or the question of subject-matter jurisdiction, which was not yet ripe for decision at that preliminary stage.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

Art. 30 Abs. 1 BV; §§ 17 und 30 GSMP. Die Einrede der Unzuständigkeit entbindet die Parteien nicht vor dem Erscheinen zur Einigungsverhandlung. | Zivilprozessrecht

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
audience de conciliation objet du litige convention de rupture décision préjudicielle incompétence ratione materiae griefs de procédure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 30 Abs. 1 BV
Cited in the headline and in the reasoning to confirm that the right to the constitutional judge was not violated regarding the costs decision.
Art. 29 BV
Art. 273 OR
§ 17 GSMP
Cited to justify the imposition of procedure costs when a party fails to appear at the conciliation hearing.
§ 30 GSMP
Cited in conjunction with § 17 GSMP to characterize the costs decision as not being a decision on the merits or procedural prerequisites.
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 30 Abs. 1 BV

Cited in the headline and in the reasoning to confirm that the right to the constitutional judge was not violated regarding the costs decision.

§ 17 GSMP

Cited to justify the imposition of procedure costs when a party fails to appear at the conciliation hearing.

§ 30 GSMP

Cited in conjunction with § 17 GSMP to characterize the costs decision as not being a decision on the merits or procedural prerequisites.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 27.11.2007

Fallnummer: · 11 07 125

LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 25

Leitsatz: · Art. 30 Abs. 1 BV; §§ 17 und 30 GSMP. Die Einrede der Unzuständigkeit entbindet die Parteien nicht vor dem Erscheinen zur Einigungsverhandlung.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.