Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
11 02 71 • KG LU 11 02 71 Généré par l'IA

Prohibition on Altering Legal Claims on Appeal

Numéro de cause 11 02 71
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court determined that the prohibition on altering legal claims in the second instance, as stipulated by the relevant procedural code, is absolute and is not negated by reserving the right to bring a subsequent claim, which would only permit the assertion of different claims in a separate future proceeding. Consequently, the court ruled that it could not consider the appeal where the appellant sought new or increased claims in the grounds of appeal, although a reduction of the legal claims remains permissible at any stage.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 98 Abs. 2 ZPO, § 98 Abs. 3 ZPO; Prohibition on Altering Legal Claims on Appeal: Consequently, the court ruled that it could not consider the appeal where the appellant sought new or increased claims in the grounds of appeal, although a reduction of the legal claims remains permissible at any stage.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
modification de la demande droits procéduraux droit de demeurer créance future interdiction de l'arbitraire recours contre décision de renvoi

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 98 Abs. 2 ZPO
Cited as the rule prohibiting the change of claims in the second instance, leading to the non-admission of the appeal concerning new or increased claims.
§ 98 Abs. 3 ZPO
Cited to distinguish that a restriction of the claims is always possible, even in the second instance.
Généré par l'IA
11 97 23 242
Appeal on Procedural Prohibition of New Evidence in Nullity Proceedings
11 03 23
Claim Value Reduction in Appeal Does Not Alter Procedural Basis
22 04 104
Admissibility of New Facts in Appeal Procedure
11 03 2
Claim and Request Amendments Under $\S 98$ Code of Civil Procedure
21 06 100 3
Appeal Conviction Reversal and Prohibition on Worsening Appellant's Position

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 98 Abs. 2 ZPO

Cited as the rule prohibiting the change of claims in the second instance, leading to the non-admission of the appeal concerning new or increased claims.

§ 98 Abs. 3 ZPO

Cited to distinguish that a restriction of the claims is always possible, even in the second instance.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 26.06.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 02 71

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 34

Leitsatz: · § 98 Abs. 2 ZPO. Der Vorbehalt eines Nachklagerechts hebt das Klageänderungsverbot vor zweiter Instanz nicht auf.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.