Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
01 05 11 • KG LU 01 05 11 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Dismissed Due to Insufficient Proof of Appellant Insolvency for Cost Security

Numéro de cause 01 05 11
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party who filed an appeal was ordered to secure the opposing party's costs upon request if the appellant appeared to be insolvent, defined as when their assets were likely insufficient to cover the judgment award, which only needed to be made plausible, not strictly proven. The appellate court dismissed the request for security because the appellant's low income, lack of taxable assets, and a self-serving declaration of destitution made in a separate criminal proceeding were insufficient to credibly establish insolvency, especially given the lack of adverse enforcement records and the possibility of income from a jointly held company.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 125 ZPO; Appeal Dismissed Due to Insufficient Proof of Appellant Insolvency for Cost Security: The appellate court dismissed the request for security because the appellant's low income, lack of taxable assets, and a self-serving declaration of destitution made in a separate criminal proceeding were insufficient to credibly establish insolvency, especially given the lack of adverse enforcement records and the possibility of income from a jointly held company.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
insolvabilité constitution de sûretés preuve insuffisante d'aggravation médicale faibles revenus frais d'exécution bénéfice § 125 ZPO. Begriff und Nachweis der Zahlungsunfähigkeit. | Zivilprozessrecht

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 125 ZPO

This provision governs the requirement for a party who has filed an appeal to provide security for the opponent's costs if they appear to be insolvent, and the court ultimately denied the application for security based on this provision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · Präsident der I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht Entscheiddatum: · 26.07.2005 Fallnummer: · 01 05 11 LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 33 Leitsatz: · § 125 ZPO. Begriff und Nachweis der Zahlungsunfähigkeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.