Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/241/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/241/2006 Généré par l'IA

Agency Denial of Public Records Request Overturned Due to Insufficient Justification

Numéro de cause ATAS/241/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from a request for certain documents under a statutory right to access public records, which was initially denied by the agency based on exemptions for ongoing internal deliberations and attorney-client privilege related to pending litigation. The court reasoned that while the deliberation and attorney-client privilege exemptions could initially shield documents, the agency failed to meet its burden to demonstrate that the harm of disclosure outweighed the public interest in disclosure, particularly because the underlying matter had concluded and the records sought were historical, fact-based materials rather than purely deliberative drafts, thus requiring disclosure of all non-exempt portions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Agency Denial of Public Records Request Overturned Due to Insufficient Justification: The court reasoned that while the deliberation and attorney-client privilege exemptions could initially shield documents, the agency failed to meet its burden to demonstrate that the harm of disclosure outweighed the public interest in disclosure, particularly because the underlying matter had concluded and the records sought were historical, fact-based materials rather than purely deliberative drafts, thus requiring disclosure of all non-exempt portions.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit d'accès aux documents objet du litige tenue insuffisante du dossier secret professionnel de l'avocat prétention légale droit de manifester

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ruled on the allocation of court costs in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               !"#$%!%&&' !%"(!%&&)



+ *+, ,-,  +*, -

.  %  ("  %&&) 



 /0000000000 





1- 2,*  3 45 5 ""!*  !""!!#$"#"%& #" %&'( ) 

                

   0&+-0  

,+ , 6

 1"233333333334"05)6**7**8"#5"#   !""!!  #$"# " 4"05) 1 96  " 5 $:9   4"05)$""!*6#% "&''-%!&''/;

$< #= 5"    ">*  8  # $""!*  " # #5#<#5" *5;

#*""#?!"&''/"# "!!#-$',/@-/<$""!*;

    8" 55""  ""*  !" 5 " # & A" &''/ =5"BC7**8"#$"#!"*A")#$0DE!>;

5#*""55""#-'A"&''/"8"*,7&''/  F 5 "   " 5  # # ? 7 &''/ $""!*  A* $55""#!##!";

5#*#- !7&''/!"5*##&/ !7&''/F 5  "7 # *  &G  !7 &''/    *  7 # "B"B"#!#<5"# ;

#H! B*5#"#!5"5#5"8"=* (!&''?$"5**"=*;

5*<$#"5*#$""!*"#"B*B$*D! ##*"5"7B "#"=8"55""#    !" B   *" !"8! " 7 5  # #" *;

$< $" # $#"    ** >#* < A> 5) !"" # 5)0 7@

-,7*, , *-

 "7#*!5*!")4@/?@&@#66;

#*""55""#55*"##"#$#!"""# $:9  5 8"$7A#$5)# "7#* #-'AB"" "8"";

5"#*"8"=*5"55C5>** # #8!A#""##*"#$!5CD!#$>"48@%?# "5*##!""" 0"05) 6;



+,-.&+&''/  0-+-0     #*" !! < "  #!" #  !!""  =5" B$"!7!#"#"!DA*>!8*"*5!"A "" 4%( 6;

$$5)#*""55""**"8"*##?7 &''/ "58">#"B$#**5*# #&/ !7&''/;

5*B" 75##" *#*"*D*  #" (  !7 &''/    $*>   # 8 !A  !"8#$!5CD!@

*  -6  *+, ,-,  +*, -



859   :  ;   < ()% -=

%@ *" 7@

&@ "B5*#>"@



   88"I *"#I     " 9 79



5"8!#5*C"8"*=5"5>88





+,-.&+&''/