Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1142/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/1142/2006 Généré par l'IA

Commercial Facility Accessibility Mandate Zoning Challenge

Numéro de cause ATAS/1142/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner sought to enjoin the enforcement of a statutory provision requiring certain commercial facilities to have an accessible ramp, arguing the requirement constituted an unconstitutional taking of property because the cost of installation was disproportionate to the minimal benefit derived from the mandate, and that the regulation exceeded the government's authority. The court held that the regulation was a legitimate exercise of the government's police power designed to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring general accessibility, and since the regulation imposed only a relatively minor financial burden aimed at correcting a preexisting condition (inaccessible structures) for public benefit, it did not constitute a regulatory taking requiring just compensation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Commercial Facility Accessibility Mandate Zoning Challenge: The court held that the regulation was a legitimate exercise of the government's police power designed to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring general accessibility, and since the regulation imposed only a relatively minor financial burden aimed at correcting a preexisting condition (inaccessible structures) for public benefit, it did not constitute a regulatory taking requiring just compensation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
réglementation sur les zones à bâtir condition légale expropriation matérielle dépassement de la hauteur maximale droit de superficie expulsion de locaux commerciaux

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited in the dispositive for ordering the appellant to pay the court fees.
Généré par l'IA
A/1541/2012
Zoning Regulation Challenge: Commercial Diversity Mandate Deemed Economic Policy Infringement
A/2784/2006
Commercial Access Challenge to Municipal Traffic Redesign
A/3005/2013
Neighboring Property Owner v. Administrative Authorization for Garage Access Setback
A/2340/2023
Owner v. Administrative Department on Building Permit Regularization Appealability
A/3311/2020
Neighboring Owners v. Building Permit on Insufficient Access Road

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in the dispositive for ordering the appellant to pay the court fees.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                !"#$ #""$  %%!# #""$



&' (') ) & ' )

*+,  $  %% -+,  #""$ 



 !"#$!    %

%

&&     ' !()"*!" %#$ +"+(,!   

             

   +0-1+  

  "$  22% " 0. %3 0//, " '44 % " '#2 5 64#%"$"0,2%#30//,"'44$7"2#% 5628%9'%": 2";)<

""<

  $2 " '  " 0= (#3 0//,  *  " > "$#3 0//, *' 24(3#%*%9'%"%"; )<

   .*7(?7%)"56$%$#"4$ %%%$!"@>A%0//1! 3%"!#2$ " ;)7!"%2$"%%(+2$"%!;22$%%>,)7 5%:>%:%;, 6<

%9?%"?$%">,)7!2 34$"$ 0=)(0//.5 &>1/>/,6!" 7("2%$!>14$(! "2%%%7%2#%%% 3%" " $7   9 % )7 %%! ! " ?%%% " ?$% " (B)7<

 4#$#% 9 '%: ;,  : > %:  C: D !  3 % " E%%*"%%%2$( 9?%;,   * % %( 9   4$"$  ?+CF#7 37% % ?"#%$"?(3%$"0;)>GD05 6<

#2$%2)7""?2@%$%3<

''2@!' H%$""">"$#30//, 2$"%%7!(%"'2"%!"'"#%%% "'"$22%"0.%30//,:



-./0,-0//,  +1-1+  

  / ) (') ) & ' )



0-.1. ++ 2  3..  .   4 5 %$# )6

  1. +I

>: $(3:

 1.I

0: '"#%<

1:   "$  22% " '44 % " '#2 " 0. %3 0//,<

.: %*2$"%7%%<

;: 4#  2% "  *? 2(% 4#  %  2$% J% "  "$ " 1/ ) "@  %4% 2 2 ##"$ "$  3 4$"$ " ! KCLMC4* ,! ,//.   !  % B#2:  "$  2% J% 27$:  #$# "%I 6 "* B%#%*"$%"$3%%2""$ %%*$< 36 B2 2 * #%4  %# 2( "#" %% % "$< 6 2%  7%   "  2$%%: K  #$#  %% 2  % $$#% $#$$  %% 6 36 % 6 +"!  34$"$"22%#%@*? "("$(3:#$#"#%#H " 2(! * % )%!  *  "$ %%*$ % ?(22 " *$%$B2$"$%5%:>10!>/,%>/D6:  744@  $"%   HK $ 

 24#" 2$% J%%%4$B2%%K$%%"? %%9 ?$#2744



-./0,-0//,