Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACJC/513/2025 • CJ GE ACJC/513/2025 Généré par l'IA

Annulment of Bankruptcy Due to Debt Repayment

Numéro de cause ACJC/513/2025
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed a timely appeal against a first-instance judgment that had declared the appellant bankrupt. The court ultimately annulled the bankruptcy order because the debt that formed the basis for the initial declaration had been subsequently paid, including interest and costs, leading the court to reverse the initial ruling while confirming the remainder of the judgment and assessing the appeal costs against the appellant, with a warning that any future bankruptcy declaration would not be retracted without proof of solvency accompanying the appeal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 174 LP, Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC, Art. 319 ss CPC, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Annulment of Bankruptcy Due to Debt Repayment: The court ultimately annulled the bankruptcy order because the debt that formed the basis for the initial declaration had been subsequently paid, including interest and costs, leading the court to reverse the initial ruling while confirming the remainder of the judgment and assessing the appeal costs against the appellant, with a warning that any future bankruptcy declaration would not be retracted without proof of solvency accompanying the appeal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
remboursement de dette preuve de solvabilité motivation sur le fond révocation de la faillite effets d'un arrêt d'annulation commination de faillite

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP
This article is cited in the reasoning section preceding the dispositive and likely relates to the substantive basis for the judgment regarding bankruptcy, which the court ultimately overturned (annulled).
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100
Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC
This procedural article is cited in the reasoning section preceding the dispositive and relates to the admissibility or grounds for the appeal being considered.
Art. 319 ss CPC
These procedural articles are cited in the reasoning section preceding the dispositive and relate to the procedure governing the appeal.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Although not explicitly in the dispositive orders, the final part of the decision (after the orders) indicates that the court's decision could be appealed via recourse under Art. 72 ss LTF, and subsequent text mentions the procedure for appealing to the Federal Tribunal (Art. 100 al. 1 LTF), but since the cost provision cited (Art. 66 LTF) is only mentioned in the section indicating appeal avenues, and not in the orders themselves, it should technically be excluded based on strict rules. However, no explicit costs are mentioned in the operative section, only the compensation of the advance payment. Since the instruction requires looking *only* at the dispositive, and the dispositive only confirms the costs based on the appeal outcome without citing a specific article for imposing costs *in the operative section*, no provision strictly meets the criteria for costs based on the operative section alone.
Généré par l'IA
C/13353/2020
Bankruptcy Annulment Following Debt Repayment
C/19743/2023
Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Debt Repayment
C/2119/2021
Bankruptcy Annulment Due to Debt Repayment
C/21582/2024
Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Full Debt Repayment
C/9988/2021
Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Debt Repayment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP

This article is cited in the reasoning section preceding the dispositive and likely relates to the substantive basis for the judgment regarding bankruptcy, which the court ultimately overturned (annulled).

Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC

This procedural article is cited in the reasoning section preceding the dispositive and relates to the admissibility or grounds for the appeal being considered.

Art. 319 ss CPC

These procedural articles are cited in the reasoning section preceding the dispositive and relate to the procedure governing the appeal.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Although not explicitly in the dispositive orders, the final part of the decision (after the orders) indicates that the court's decision could be appealed via recourse under Art. 72 ss LTF, and subsequent text mentions the procedure for appealing to the Federal Tribunal (Art. 100 al. 1 LTF), but since the cost provision cited (Art. 66 LTF) is only mentioned in the section indicating appeal avenues, and not in the orders themselves, it should technically be excluded based on strict rules. However, no explicit costs are mentioned in the operative section, only the compensation of the advance payment. Since the instruction requires looking *only* at the dispositive, and the dispositive only confirms the costs based on the appeal outcome without citing a specific article for imposing costs *in the operative section*, no provision strictly meets the criteria for costs based on the operative section alone.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

République et canton de Genève POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE Chambre civile Cour de justice civile

Recourante : Intimée : A______ B______/C______ [Assurance maladie] ______ repr. par B______/D______ ______ Service du contentieux ______ ______

C/2302/2025 ACJC/513/2025 DU LUNDI 14 AVRIL 2025

Vu le jugement JTPI/4644/2025 du 1er avril 2025 prononçant la faillite de A______ (ch. 1 du dispositif); Vu le recours contre ledit jugement formé le 14 avril 2025 par A______, dans le délai et la forme prescrits par l'art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC; Vu le paiement de la dette, intérêts et frais compris; Attendu que l'attention de la partie recourante est expressément attirée sur le fait qu'une nouvelle faillite la concernant, qui serait prononcée postérieurement à la réception du présent arrêt, ne sera plus rétractée, sauf si elle prouve sa solvabilité par pièces, jointes au recours; Vu en droit les articles 174 LP, 309 let. b ch. 7 et 319 ss CPC.

PAR CES MOTIFS, La Chambre civile : Annule le chiffre 1 du dispositif du jugement de faillite N° JTPI/4644/2025 rendu par le Tribunal de première instance le 1er avril 2025 dans la cause C/2302/2025-22 SFC (poursuite N° 1______). Confirme le jugement pour le surplus. Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours, taxés à 220 fr., et dit qu'ils sont compensés par l'avance de frais de même montant fournie par elle, qui reste acquise à l'Etat de Genève. Siégeant : Madame Pauline ERARD, présidente; Madame Nathalie LANDRY-BARTHE, Madame Nathalie RAPP, juges; Madame Marie-Pierre GROSJEAN, greffière.

Indication des voies de recours : Conformément aux art. 72 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005 (LTF; RS 173.110), le

présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100

al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile. Le recours doit être adressé au Tribunal fédéral, 1000 Lausanne 14. Communiqué le dispositif du présent arrêt aux parties par plis recommandés, ainsi qu'à l'Office des faillites, à l'Office des poursuites, au Registre du commerce et au Registre foncier le 15 avril 2025.