Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACJC/510/2024 • CJ GE ACJC/510/2024 Généré par l'IA

Appeal of Bankruptcy Judgment Upon Debt Payment

Numéro de cause ACJC/510/2024
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party appealed a judgment from April 15, 2024, which declared them bankrupt, filing the appeal within the prescribed time limit, and subsequently paid the debt, interest, and costs owed. The court considered the payment of the debt and, based on applicable procedural law, annulled the first part of the bankruptcy judgment while confirming the remainder, cautioning the appellant that any future bankruptcy declaration would not be revoked unless solvency could be proven with the appeal documents.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 174 LP, Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, Art. 319 ss CPC, Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC, art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC; Appeal of Bankruptcy Judgment Upon Debt Payment: The court considered the payment of the debt and, based on applicable procedural law, annulled the first part of the bankruptcy judgment while confirming the remainder, cautioning the appellant that any future bankruptcy declaration would not be revoked unless solvency could be proven with the appeal documents.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
paiement de la dette dispositif du jugement commination de faillite moment du dépôt frais de la procédure révocation de la faillite

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP
Although cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, the annulling order does not explicitly cite a substantive article that forms the main ground for the final decision (the context suggests the payment of the debt led to the revocation, which might fall under Art. 174 LP, but the dispositive itself does not explicitly cite the main ground). However, since the core action is annulling a bankruptcy order based on subsequent payment, Art. 174 LP (which deals with the revocation of bankruptcy) is the substantive basis implied by the context of the case, even if the citation is not strictly in the dispositive orders themselves, but is listed as relevant law for the decision that resulted in the annulment.
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
This procedural rule regarding the notification deadline for appeal to the Federal Tribunal is cited in the section on indications of remedies, not in the operative orders.
Art. 319 ss CPC
Although cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, this provision relates to the appeal procedure and is not explicitly cited in the operative section which dictates the result (annulment, confirmation, costs).
Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC
Although cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, this provision relates to the appeal procedure and is not explicitly cited in the operative section which dictates the result (annulment, confirmation, costs).
art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC
This procedural rule concerns the admissibility and timing of the appeal and is mentioned in the context of the filing, but not explicitly cited in the operative disposal orders regarding the decision itself or costs.
Généré par l'IA
C/6707/2024
Appeal of Bankruptcy Declaration After Debt Payment
C/4316/2020
Appeal of Bankruptcy Declaration Due to Subsequent Debt Payment
C/12029/2023
Appeal of Bankruptcy Declaration After Debt Payment
C/305/2024
Appeal of Bankruptcy Judgment Annulled Upon Payment
C/22591/2020
Appeal of Bankruptcy Declaration Granted Upon Debt Payment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP

Although cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, the annulling order does not explicitly cite a substantive article that forms the main ground for the final decision (the context suggests the payment of the debt led to the revocation, which might fall under Art. 174 LP, but the dispositive itself does not explicitly cite the main ground). However, since the core action is annulling a bankruptcy order based on subsequent payment, Art. 174 LP (which deals with the revocation of bankruptcy) is the substantive basis implied by the context of the case, even if the citation is not strictly in the dispositive orders themselves, but is listed as relevant law for the decision that resulted in the annulment.

Art. 319 ss CPC

Although cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, this provision relates to the appeal procedure and is not explicitly cited in the operative section which dictates the result (annulment, confirmation, costs).

Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC

Although cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, this provision relates to the appeal procedure and is not explicitly cited in the operative section which dictates the result (annulment, confirmation, costs).

art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC

This procedural rule concerns the admissibility and timing of the appeal and is mentioned in the context of the filing, but not explicitly cited in the operative disposal orders regarding the decision itself or costs.

art. 100 al. 1 LTF

This procedural rule regarding the notification deadline for appeal to the Federal Tribunal is cited in the section on indications of remedies, not in the operative orders.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

République et canton de Genève POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE Chambre civile Cour de justice civile

Recourante : Intimée : Madame B______ SA A______ Repr. par C______ SA ______ ______ ______ [GE] ______ [ZH]

C/5174/2024 ACJC/510/2024 DU MARDI 23 AVRIL 2024

Vu le jugement JTPI/4701/2024 du 15 avril 2024 prononçant la faillite de A______ (ch. 1 du dispositif); Vu le recours contre ledit jugement formé le 22 avril 2024 par A______, dans le délai et la forme prescrits par l'art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC; Vu le paiement de la dette, intérêts et frais compris; Attendu que l'attention de la partie recourante est expressément attirée sur le fait qu'une nouvelle faillite la concernant, qui serait prononcée postérieurement à la réception du présent arrêt, ne sera plus rétractée, sauf si elle prouve sa solvabilité par pièces, jointes au recours; Vu en droit les articles 174 LP, 309 let. b ch. 7 et 319 ss CPC.

PAR CES MOTIFS, La Chambre civile : Annule le chiffre 1 du dispositif du jugement de faillite N° JTPI/4701/2024 rendu par le Tribunal de première instance le 15 avril 2024 dans la cause C/5174/2024-19 SFC (poursuite N° 1______). Confirme le jugement pour le surplus. Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours, taxés à 220 fr., et dit qu'ils sont compensés par l'avance de frais de même montant fournie par elle, qui reste acquise à l'Etat de Genève. Siégeant : Madame Pauline ERARD, présidente; Madame Nathalie LANDRY-BARTHE, Madame Nathalie RAPP, juges; Madame Laura SESSA, greffière.

Indication des voies de recours : Conformément aux art. 72 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005 (LTF; RS 173.110), le

présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100

al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile. Le recours doit être adressé au Tribunal fédéral, 1000 Lausanne 14.

Communiqué le dispositif du présent arrêt aux parties par plis recommandés, ainsi qu'à l'Office des faillites, à l'Office des poursuites, au Registre du commerce et au Registre foncier le 25 avril 2024.