Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACJC/34/2023 • CJ GE ACJC/34/2023 Généré par l'IA

Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Debt Satisfaction with Appeal Cost Allocation

Numéro de cause ACJC/34/2023
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An individual appealed a lower court's decision that declared them bankrupt, and during the appeal process, the debt underlying the bankruptcy, including interest and costs, was fully paid. The appellate court, noting the payment of the debt, annulled the specific provision of the lower court's judgment that ordered the bankruptcy, while confirming the rest of the judgment, and ruled that the appellant would bear the appeal costs, which were compensated by their own advance payment retained by the state, while also explicitly warning the appellant that any future bankruptcy would not be automatically revoked unless solvency was proven with the appeal documents.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 174 LP, Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, art. 319 ss CPC, art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC, art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Debt Satisfaction with Appeal Cost Allocation: The appellate court, noting the payment of the debt, annulled the specific provision of the lower court's judgment that ordered the bankruptcy, while confirming the rest of the judgment, and ruled that the appellant would bear the appeal costs, which were compensated by their own advance payment retained by the state, while also explicitly warning the appellant that any future bankruptcy would not be automatically revoked unless solvency was proven with the appeal documents.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
paiement de la dette avance de frais répartition des frais révocation de la faillite effets d'un arrêt d'annulation procédure de revendication dans la faillite

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP
This article is cited regarding the legal basis for the action taken (the annulment of the bankruptcy judgment due to payment of the debt).
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*
art. 319 ss CPC
This provision relates to the procedure for appeal, but the key decision is based on the payment of the debt, leading to the annulment of the bankruptcy judgment.
art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC
This article is cited regarding the grounds for challenging the lower court's decision.
art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited in the indication of appeal remedies, but since no costs were ordered against the losing party in the dispositive (costs were compensated), I must check if any cost provision was *used* in the dispositive orders. The dispositive orders the compensation of costs based on the advance paid, which is a procedural ruling concerning costs, but the explicitly cited cost article is usually Art. 68 LTF or specific Cantonal code provisions for the imposition/compensation of costs. Since the final order deals with costs via compensation using the advance, and no explicit cost provision (like Art. 66 LTF) is cited in the final orders (1, 2, 3), I will rely only on the substantive/procedural ones cited earlier in the reasoning section leading to the order.
Généré par l'IA
C/18542/2021
Bankruptcy Annulment Due to Debt Satisfaction with Appeal Cost Allocation
C/21315/2024
Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Debt Payment and Appeal Cost Allocation
C/25764/2020
Annulment of Bankruptcy Due to Debt Satisfaction; Appeal Costs Awarded
C/2295/2025
Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Debt Payment with Appeal Cost Allocation
C/15237/2021
Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Debt Satisfaction

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
art. 319 ss CPC

This provision relates to the procedure for appeal, but the key decision is based on the payment of the debt, leading to the annulment of the bankruptcy judgment.

art. 174 LP

This article is cited regarding the legal basis for the action taken (the annulment of the bankruptcy judgment due to payment of the debt).

art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC

This article is cited regarding the grounds for challenging the lower court's decision.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in the indication of appeal remedies, but since no costs were ordered against the losing party in the dispositive (costs were compensated), I must check if any cost provision was *used* in the dispositive orders. The dispositive orders the compensation of costs based on the advance paid, which is a procedural ruling concerning costs, but the explicitly cited cost article is usually Art. 68 LTF or specific Cantonal code provisions for the imposition/compensation of costs. Since the final order deals with costs via compensation using the advance, and no explicit cost provision (like Art. 66 LTF) is cited in the final orders (1, 2, 3), I will rely only on the substantive/procedural ones cited earlier in the reasoning section leading to the order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

C/21790/2022

### [ACJC/34/2023](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/show/3225046) du 12.01.2023 sur JTPI/15045/2022 ( SFC ) , JUGE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/file//2023/0000/ACJC_000034_2023_C_21790_2022.pdf)

[Par ces motifs](#PCM)

République et canton de Genève POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE Cour de justice civile · Chambre civile

Recourant : · Intimée :

Monsieur A______ ______ ______ · CAISSE DE COMPENSATION B______ ______ ______

C/21790/2022 ACJC/34/2023

DU JEUDI 12 JANVIER 2023

Vu le jugement JTPI/15045/2022 du 15 décembre 2022 prononçant la faillite de A______ (ch. 1 du dispositif);

Vu le recours contre ledit jugement formé le 21 décembre 2022 par A______, dans le délai et la forme prescrits par l'art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC;

Vu le paiement de la dette, intérêts et frais compris;

Attendu que l'attention de la partie recourante est expressément attirée sur le fait qu'une nouvelle faillite la concernant, qui serait prononcée postérieurement à la réception du présent arrêt, ne sera plus rétractée, sauf si elle prouve sa solvabilité par pièces, jointes au recours;

Vu en droit les articles 174 LP, 309 let. b ch. 7 et 319 ss CPC.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

La Chambre civile :

Annule le chiffre 1 du dispositif du jugement de faillite N° JTPI/15045/2022 rendu par le Tribunal de première instance le 15 décembre 2022 dans la cause C/21790/2022-10 SFC (poursuite N° 1______).

Confirme le jugement pour le surplus.

Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours, taxés à 220 fr., et dit qu'ils sont compensés par l'avance de frais de même montant fournie par elle, qui reste acquise à l'Etat de Genève.

Siégeant :

Madame Pauline ERARD, présidente; Madame Nathalie LANDRY-BARTHE, Monsieur

Ivo BUETTI, juges; Madame Laura SESSA, greffière.

*Indication des voies de recours* *:*

*Conformément aux art. 72 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005 (LTF;

RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*

*Le recours doit être adressé au Tribunal fédéral, 1000 Lausanne 14.*