Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACJC/238/2024 • CJ GE ACJC/238/2024 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Mooted by Debt Repayment and Bankruptcy Annulment

Numéro de cause ACJC/238/2024
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appeal was lodged against a judgment that declared the appellant bankrupt, but the appeal was rendered moot because the appellant subsequently paid the debt, including interest and costs. The court consequently annulled the bankruptcy declaration in the lower court's decision, confirming the rest of the judgment, and ordered the appellant to bear the costs of the appeal, which were offset by the advance payment made. The court also warned the appellant that any subsequent declaration of bankruptcy would not be retracted unless solvency was proven with the appeal documents.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 174 LP, Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, art. 319 ss CPC, art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC, art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Mooted by Debt Repayment and Bankruptcy Annulment: The court consequently annulled the bankruptcy declaration in the lower court's decision, confirming the rest of the judgment, and ordered the appellant to bear the costs of the appeal, which were offset by the advance payment made. The court also warned the appellant that any subsequent declaration of bankruptcy would not be retracted unless solvency was proven with the appeal documents.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
remboursement de dette avance de frais liquidation ordinaire de la faillite contrôle de la procédure ordre de paiement opposition au commandement de payer

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP
This provision is cited in the legal basis section and relates to the conditions for bankruptcy, which is the core subject matter being addressed (annulment of the bankruptcy order).
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
72 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005 (LTF; RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*
art. 319 ss CPC
This provision likely forms the procedural basis for reviewing and potentially annulling the initial bankruptcy judgment upon appeal, as it is cited in the legal basis section before the dispositive.
art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC
This provision is cited in the legal basis section and likely concerns a specific ground for appeal related to the bankruptcy decision.
art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Although the text does not explicitly cite Art. 66 al. 1 LTF in the dispositive, the instruction is to include cost provisions cited in the dispositive. Since the dispositive orders the appellant to pay the costs (and indicates they are covered by the advance payment), a relevant cost provision should be included if cited. However, since *no* specific cost article (like Art. 68 or Art. 66 LTF) is explicitly written in the dispositive orders (only the resulting cost order is stated), I must adhere strictly to the rule: only include provisions *explicitly cited* in the numbered orders or the paragraph immediately preceding them that dictates the outcome. The decision cites procedural/substantive articles (174 LP, 309 CPC, 319 CPC) prior to the dispositive, which resulted in the annulment. Since the cost disposition does not cite an article, I will only include the substantive/procedural articles cited as grounds for the ruling, as no specific cost provision is cited in the dispositive itself.
Généré par l'IA
C/23293/2020
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration Rendered Moot by Debt Repayment
C/18602/2022
Appeal of Bankruptcy Declaration Mooted by Debt Payment
C/5676/2021
Moot Bankruptcy Appeal After Debt Payment
C/19359/2022
Moot Appeal Due to Debt Payment and Annulment of Bankruptcy Declaration
C/24980/2023
Appeal of Bankruptcy Annulled Due to Debt Repayment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
art. 319 ss CPC

This provision likely forms the procedural basis for reviewing and potentially annulling the initial bankruptcy judgment upon appeal, as it is cited in the legal basis section before the dispositive.

art. 174 LP

This provision is cited in the legal basis section and relates to the conditions for bankruptcy, which is the core subject matter being addressed (annulment of the bankruptcy order).

art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC

This provision is cited in the legal basis section and likely concerns a specific ground for appeal related to the bankruptcy decision.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Although the text does not explicitly cite Art. 66 al. 1 LTF in the dispositive, the instruction is to include cost provisions cited in the dispositive. Since the dispositive orders the appellant to pay the costs (and indicates they are covered by the advance payment), a relevant cost provision should be included if cited. However, since *no* specific cost article (like Art. 68 or Art. 66 LTF) is explicitly written in the dispositive orders (only the resulting cost order is stated), I must adhere strictly to the rule: only include provisions *explicitly cited* in the numbered orders or the paragraph immediately preceding them that dictates the outcome. The decision cites procedural/substantive articles (174 LP, 309 CPC, 319 CPC) prior to the dispositive, which resulted in the annulment. Since the cost disposition does not cite an article, I will only include the substantive/procedural articles cited as grounds for the ruling, as no specific cost provision is cited in the dispositive itself.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

C/25526/2023

### [ACJC/238/2024](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/show/3316920) du 16.02.2024 sur JTPI/2002/2024 ( SFC ) , JUGE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/file//2024/0002/ACJC_000238_2024_C_25526_2023.pdf)

[Par ces motifs](#PCM)

République et canton de Genève POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE Cour de justice civile · Chambre civile

Recourante : · Intimée :

Madame A______ ______ ______ [GE] · B______ SA ______ ______ [GE]

C/25526/2023 ACJC/238/2024

DU vendredi 16 fevrier 2024

Vu le jugement JTPI/2002/2024 du 12 février 2024 prononçant la faillite de A______ (ch. 1 du dispositif);

Vu le recours contre ledit jugement formé le 15 février 2024 par A______, dans le délai et la forme prescrits par l'art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC;

Vu le paiement de la dette, intérêts et frais compris;

Attendu que l'attention de la partie recourante est expressément attirée sur le fait qu'une nouvelle faillite la concernant, qui serait prononcée postérieurement à la réception du présent arrêt, ne sera plus rétractée, sauf si elle prouve sa solvabilité par pièces, jointes au recours;

Vu en droit les articles 174 LP, 309 let. b ch. 7 et 319 ss CPC.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

La Chambre civile :

Annule le chiffre 1 du dispositif du jugement de faillite N° JTPI/2002/2024 rendu par le Tribunal de première instance le 12 février 2024 dans la cause C/25526/2023‑5 SFC (poursuite N° 1______).

Confirme le jugement pour le surplus.

Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours, taxés à 220 fr., et dit qu'ils sont compensés par l'avance de frais de même montant fournie par elle, qui reste acquise à l'Etat de Genève.

Siégeant :

Madame Pauline ERARD, présidente; Madame Nathalie LANDRY-BARTHE, Monsieur Ivo BUETTI, juges; Madame Mélanie DE RESENDE PEREIRA, greffière.

*Indication des voies de recours* *:*

*Conformément aux art. 72 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005 (LTF; RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*

*Le recours doit être adressé au Tribunal fédéral, 1000 Lausanne 14.*