Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACJC/1702/2021 • CJ GE ACJC/1702/2021 Généré par l'IA

Appellant Successfully Voids Bankruptcy After Debt Repayment

Numéro de cause ACJC/1702/2021
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appellant challenged a lower court's decision from December 16, 2021, which had declared their bankruptcy, but the appellant subsequently paid the debt, interest, and costs owed. The appellate court annulled the bankruptcy order from the lower court's decision, confirming the judgment in all other respects, reasoning that the subsequent payment of the debt rendered the initial bankruptcy pronouncement moot, while cautioning the appellant that any future bankruptcy declaration would not be retracted unless solvency was proven with the appeal documentation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 174 LP, Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, art. 319 ss CPC, art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC, art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC, art. 72 ss LTF; Appellant Successfully Voids Bankruptcy After Debt Repayment: The appellate court annulled the bankruptcy order from the lower court's decision, confirming the judgment in all other respects, reasoning that the subsequent payment of the debt rendered the initial bankruptcy pronouncement moot, while cautioning the appellant that any future bankruptcy declaration would not be retracted unless solvency was proven with the appeal documentation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
remboursement de dette liquidation ordinaire de la faillite décisions incidentes solvabilité établie opposition au commandement de payer révocation de la faillite

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP
This article, concerning bankruptcy law, is the substantive basis for the court's decision to annul the bankruptcy order (chiffre 1 du dispositif).
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
This article is cited in the indication of remedies as the rule governing the deadline for filing a federal appeal against the decision.
art. 319 ss CPC
This article is cited in the legal grounds section (Vu en droit), and the court's decision structure implies that the review of the appeal was conducted based on the relevant procedure for challenging a bankruptcy decision.
art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC
This procedural article concerning the grounds for appeal in the cantonal procedure is cited among the legal provisions considered.
art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC
This article regulates the admissibility and form of the appeal, which was used by the appellant to file the recourse.
art. 72 ss LTF
These articles, concerning federal appeals, are cited in the indication of remedies.
art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Although not explicitly cited in the final orders in the standard format (only costs are explicitly addressed), the cost provision is usually derived from the BGG/LTF regarding costs. However, based strictly on the requirement that it must be cited in the *dispositive*, and noting the dispositve only mentions the compensation of costs through the deposit, no explicit cost article from the LTF is cited in the final numbered orders. The cost decision itself does not cite an LTF article, only stating the consequence of the fee being kept by the State of Geneva.
Généré par l'IA
C/3585/2020
Appellant Bankruptcy Annulled Upon Debt Repayment
C/25330/2022
Appellant's Bankruptcy Annulled After Debt Repayment
C/19060/2020
Appeal of Bankruptcy Declaration After Debt Satisfaction
C/2009/2021
Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Debt Satisfaction
C/5443/2023
Bankruptcy Annulled Due to Debt Repayment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
art. 319 ss CPC

This article is cited in the legal grounds section (Vu en droit), and the court's decision structure implies that the review of the appeal was conducted based on the relevant procedure for challenging a bankruptcy decision.

art. 174 LP

This article, concerning bankruptcy law, is the substantive basis for the court's decision to annul the bankruptcy order (chiffre 1 du dispositif).

art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC

This procedural article concerning the grounds for appeal in the cantonal procedure is cited among the legal provisions considered.

art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC

This article regulates the admissibility and form of the appeal, which was used by the appellant to file the recourse.

art. 100 al. 1 LTF

This article is cited in the indication of remedies as the rule governing the deadline for filing a federal appeal against the decision.

art. 72 ss LTF

These articles, concerning federal appeals, are cited in the indication of remedies.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Although not explicitly cited in the final orders in the standard format (only costs are explicitly addressed), the cost provision is usually derived from the BGG/LTF regarding costs. However, based strictly on the requirement that it must be cited in the *dispositive*, and noting the dispositve only mentions the compensation of costs through the deposit, no explicit cost article from the LTF is cited in the final numbered orders. The cost decision itself does not cite an LTF article, only stating the consequence of the fee being kept by the State of Geneva.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

C/20472/2021

### [ACJC/1702/2021](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/show/2873391) du 21.12.2021 sur JTPI/15844/2021 ( SFC ) , JUGE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/file//2021/0017/ACJC_001702_2021_C_20472_2021.pdf)

[Par ces motifs](#PCM)

République et canton de Genève POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE Cour de justice civile · Chambre civile

Recourant : · Intimée :

Monsieur A______ Rue ______ ______ · B______ SA Rue ______ ______

C/20472/2021 ACJC/1702/2021

DU MARDI 21 DECEMBRE 2021

Vu le jugement JTPI/15844/2021 du 16 décembre 2021 prononçant la faillite de A______ (ch. 1 du dispositif);

Vu le recours contre ledit jugement formé le 21 décembre 2021 par A______, dans le délai et la forme prescrits par l'art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC;

Vu le paiement de la dette, intérêts et frais compris;

Attendu que l'attention de la partie recourante est expressément attirée sur le fait qu'une nouvelle faillite la concernant, qui serait prononcée postérieurement à la réception du présent arrêt, ne sera plus rétractée, sauf si elle prouve sa solvabilité par pièces, jointes au recours;

Vu en droit les articles 174 LP, 309 let. b ch. 7 et 319 ss CPC.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

La Chambre civile :

Annule le chiffre 1 du dispositif du jugement de faillite N° JTPI/15844/2021 rendu par le Tribunal de première instance le 16 décembre 2021 dans la cause C/20472/2021-1 SFC (poursuite N° 1______).

Confirme le jugement pour le surplus.

Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours, taxés à 220 fr., et dit qu'ils sont compensés par l'avance de frais de même montant fournie par elle, qui reste acquise à l'Etat de Genève.

Siégeant :

Madame Pauline ERARD, présidente; Monsieur Patrick CHENAUX, Monsieur Ivo BUETTI, juges; Madame Laura SESSA, greffière.

*Indication des voies de recours* *:*

*Conformément aux art. 72 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005 (LTF; RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*

*Le recours doit être adressé au Tribunal fédéral, 1000 Lausanne 14.*