Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACJC/1607/2020 • CJ GE ACJC/1607/2020 Généré par l'IA

Annulment of Bankruptcy Upon Full Debt Settlement

Numéro de cause ACJC/1607/2020
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Justice civil chamber reviewed an appeal against a judgment from October 26, 2020, which had declared the appellant bankrupt, noting that the appellant had subsequently paid the debt, interest, and costs in full. The court reasoned that because the debt giving rise to the bankruptcy order had been settled, the requirement for annulling the bankruptcy order under relevant law was met, leading the court to annul the portion of the lower court's decision that pronounced the bankruptcy while confirming the remainder of the judgment, and cautioned the appellant that future bankruptcy declarations would not be retracted without proof of solvency.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 174 LP, Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, Art. 319 ss CPC, Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Annulment of Bankruptcy Upon Full Debt Settlement: The court reasoned that because the debt giving rise to the bankruptcy order had been settled, the requirement for annulling the bankruptcy order under relevant law was met, leading the court to annul the portion of the lower court's decision that pronounced the bankruptcy while confirming the remainder of the judgment, and cautioned the appellant that future bankruptcy declarations would not be retracted without proof of solvency.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
annulation civile déclaration d'extinction de dette faillite civile assemblée des créanciers opposition tardive conditions matérielles

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP
This article is cited in the section 'Vu en droit' (Having regard to the law) and is the substantive basis for the annulment of the bankruptcy decision found in the dispositive.
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*
Art. 319 ss CPC
These procedural articles concerning the appeal mechanism are cited in the legal basis section, supporting the review and decision on the appeal against the bankruptcy judgment.
Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC
This procedural article is cited as part of the legal basis for reviewing the appeal against the bankruptcy judgment.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the final section indicates appeal routes to the Federal Tribunal, which usually relates to cost provisions like Art. 66 LTF (implied if costs were contested for the Federal Tribunal appeal, but here, the Cantonal Court orders costs based on Cantonal Procedure). However, based strictly on the Cantonal dispositive: Costs are ordered by reference to Cantonal rules, not explicitly Art. 66 LTF, which applies to the Federal Tribunal appeal route mentioned separately. Since the court ordered costs using cantonal principles, and no specific cantonal cost article is in the dispositive, we rely only on those explicitly mentioned in the numbered orders or the preceding 'Vu en droit' section which are clearly used in the reasoning for the final outcome (Art. 174 LP, Art. 319 ss CPC, Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC).
Généré par l'IA
C/19165/2025
Bankruptcy Annulment After Debt Settlement
C/3531/2025
Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Debt Repayment
C/5545/2023
In Re: Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Debt Settlement
C/17601/2024
Annulment of Bankruptcy Order Upon Full Debt Payment
C/1085/2020
Bankruptcy Annulment After Debt Payment on Appeal

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP

This article is cited in the section 'Vu en droit' (Having regard to the law) and is the substantive basis for the annulment of the bankruptcy decision found in the dispositive.

Art. 319 ss CPC

These procedural articles concerning the appeal mechanism are cited in the legal basis section, supporting the review and decision on the appeal against the bankruptcy judgment.

Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC

This procedural article is cited as part of the legal basis for reviewing the appeal against the bankruptcy judgment.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the final section indicates appeal routes to the Federal Tribunal, which usually relates to cost provisions like Art. 66 LTF (implied if costs were contested for the Federal Tribunal appeal, but here, the Cantonal Court orders costs based on Cantonal Procedure). However, based strictly on the Cantonal dispositive: Costs are ordered by reference to Cantonal rules, not explicitly Art. 66 LTF, which applies to the Federal Tribunal appeal route mentioned separately. Since the court ordered costs using cantonal principles, and no specific cantonal cost article is in the dispositive, we rely only on those explicitly mentioned in the numbered orders or the preceding 'Vu en droit' section which are clearly used in the reasoning for the final outcome (Art. 174 LP, Art. 319 ss CPC, Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC).

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

C/17574/2020

### [ACJC/1607/2020](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/show/2535626) du 16.11.2020 sur JTPI/13113/2020 ( SFC ) , JUGE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/file//2020/0016/ACJC_001607_2020_C_17574_2020.pdf)

[Par ces motifs](#PCM)

République et canton de Genève POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE Cour de justice civile · Chambre civile

Recourant : · Intimée :

Monsieur A______ c/o M. B______ ______ ______ · C______ [caisse-maladie] Service du contentieux ______ ______

C/17574/2020 ACJC/1607/2020

DU lundi 16 novembre 2020

Vu le jugement JTPI/13113/2020 du 26 octobre 2020 prononçant la faillite de A______ (ch. 1 du dispositif) ;

Vu le recours contre ledit jugement formé le 11 novembre 2020 par A______, dans le délai et la forme prescrits par l'art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC ;

Vu le paiement de la dette, intérêts et frais compris ;

Attendu que l'attention de la partie recourante est expressément attirée sur le fait qu'une nouvelle faillite la concernant, qui serait prononcée postérieurement à la réception du présent arrêt, ne sera plus rétractée, sauf si elle prouve sa solvabilité par pièces, jointes au recours ;

Vu en droit les articles 174 LP, 309 let. b ch. 7 et 319 ss CPC.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

La Chambre civile :

Annule le chiffre 1 du dispositif du jugement de faillite N° JTPI/13113/2020 rendu par le Tribunal de première instance le 26 octobre 2020 dans la cause C/17574/2020-8 SFC (poursuite N° 1______).

Confirme le jugement pour le surplus.

Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours, taxés à 220 fr., et dit qu'ils sont compensés par l'avance de frais de même montant fournie par elle, qui reste acquise à l'Etat de Genève.

Siégeant :

Madame Pauline ERARD, présidente; Madame Nathalie LANDRY-BARTHE, Monsieur

Ivo BUETTI, juges; Madame Mélanie DE RESENDE PEREIRA, greffière.

*Indication des voies de recours* *:*

*Conformément aux art. 72 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005 (LTF;

RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*

*Le recours doit être adressé au Tribunal fédéral, 1000 Lausanne 14.*