Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 212/11 AI generated

Employment contract clause providing severance for board member dismissal is valid and does not violate the law.

Case Number II PK 212/11
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially upheld the cassation appeal, overturning the lower court's finding that a specific severance clause was void. The employee argued the clause violated public policy, but the Court held that parties' agreed terms supersede general social principles. Consequently, the Court remanded the case to the district court for a new decision on the damages claim.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 18 k.p.; Art. 58 § 1 k.c.; Art. 300 k.p.: An employment contract clause stipulating compensation for the dismissal of a board member is not void for evading the law, as the parties' explicit agreement prevails over general principles of social coexistence.

Keywords

AI generated
employment contract validity board member dismissal severance compensation public policy exception pacta sunt servanda labor law enforcement cassation appeal outcome

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 18 k.p.
Art. 58 § 1 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
art. 18 k.p
art. 58 § 1 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 52 § 1 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text