Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PZP 7/11 AI generated

Employer must consult union on dismissal intent even if union refuses to provide employee list.

Case Number III PZP 7/11
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that an employer remains obligated to consult a trade union regarding a dismissal intent, even if the union refuses to provide a list of employees under its protection. The court found that the union's refusal was justified by data protection concerns and did not absolve the employer of its statutory duty. This decision ensures uniformity between administrative and judicial courts by prioritizing constitutional values over administrative interpretations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 30 ust. 21 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 38 § 1 k.p.: The failure of a trade union to provide a list of protected employees does not exempt an employer from the obligation to consult the union regarding a dismissal intent, provided the refusal is justified by data protection.

Keywords

AI generated
trade union consultation dismissal intent notification data protection exception labor law interpretation constitutional uniformity employee protection statutory obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 38 § 1 k.p.
Art. 30 ust. 21 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 23 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 29 sierpnia 1997 r. o ochronie danych osobowych
Art. 26 ust. 1 pkt 1 i 2 ustawy z dnia 29 sierpnia 1997 r. o ochronie danych osobowych
art. 38 k.p
art. 38 § 1 k.p
art. 39813 § 1 k.p.c
art. 232 k.p
art. 53 § 4 k.p
art. 112 § 1 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text