II PK 305/06
AI generated
Supreme Court quashes labor dispute verdict regarding social fund payments due to lack of evidence authorizing the director's representation.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed the lower court's judgment regarding social fund payments for several plaintiffs while dismissing the appeal on other claims. The lower court incorrectly assumed the plant director had authority to approve social fund disbursements without sufficient factual findings. The court ruled that the director's actions were invalid because there was no evidence he was authorized to represent the employer in these specific matters.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 232 k.p.; Art. 7 ust. 2 i art. 30 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 31 k.p.: A labor dispute representative must be a trade union organization member, and a plant director lacks authority to approve social fund payments absent explicit factual findings of authorization.
Keywords
AI generated
labor dispute representation
social fund payments
employer authorization
trade union rules
director authority
labor law procedure
evidence standard
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 232 k.p.
Art. 7 ust. 2 i art. 30 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 31 k.p.
Art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39821 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 232 k.p
art. 38 k.p
art. 45 § 1 k.p