Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PK 14/11 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; changing work terms does not always trigger group dismissal procedures.

Case Number III PK 14/11
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's cassation appeal in a labor dispute regarding wrongful termination of employment terms. The plaintiff sought damages for an employer's unilateral change to working conditions and pay, which the lower courts ruled constituted an illegal dismissal. The Court held that such changes do not automatically require group dismissal procedures unless the employer's intent was to terminate the employment relationship, not merely to modify terms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24113 § 2 k.p.; Art. 2-4 ustawy o zwolnieniach grupowych: Changing employment terms does not necessitate group dismissal procedures unless the employer's intent was to terminate the employment relationship.

Keywords

AI generated
group dismissal procedures changing employment terms unilateral modification labor law intent cassation appeal dismissal collective bargaining agreement workplace restructuring

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24113 § 2 k.p.
Art. 2-4 ustawy z dnia 13 marca 2003 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn niedotyczących pracowników
Art. 30 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.
Art. 42 § 2 i 3 k.p.
Art. 42 § 1-3 k.p.
Art. 231 k.p.
Art. 2418 § 2 k.p.
Art. 1 ust. 1 i art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy o zwolnieniach grupowych
Art. 398¹⁴ k.p.c.
art. 24113 § 2 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text