III PZP 3/11
AI generated
Court ruled sick leave periods do not count toward the six-month effective work requirement for annual bonus.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for an annual bonus, ruling that periods of sick leave do not count as effective work. The lower court had incorrectly interpreted the statute to include any time spent in an employment relationship, regardless of actual work performed. The court clarified that the new law requires effective work, distinguishing it from previous regulations and statutory provisions regarding vacation leave.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 2 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 12 grudnia 1997 r. o dodatkowym wynagrodzeniu rocznym dla pracowników jednostek sfery budżetowej; The period of inability to work due to illness does not count towards the six-month effective work requirement for the annual bonus.
Keywords
AI generated
annual bonus entitlement
effective work period
sick leave exclusion
budget sector employees
labor law interpretation
calendar year requirement
statutory provisions
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 2 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 12 grudnia 1997 r. o dodatkowym wynagrodzeniu rocznym dla pracowników jednostek sfery budżetowej
art. 153 k.p