Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 81/10 AI generated

Supreme Court partially allowed appeal, clarifying employer definition and termination reasons for severance pay eligibility.

Case Number I PK 81/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially revoked the lower court's dismissal of the employee's appeal regarding severance pay and work certificate. The employee claimed termination due to the employer's restructuring, while the employer argued it was a private clinic, not a healthcare facility. The Court held that the employer was correctly identified as the individual practitioner and that the termination resulted from a mutual agreement rather than the entity's liquidation, necessitating a retrial on severance eligibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3 k.p.; Art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy o zakł. opieki zdrowotnej: The employer in a private healthcare practice is the individual practitioner, and mutual agreement termination requires assessing employee contribution to deny severance if they contributed to the resolution.

Keywords

AI generated
private healthcare practice employer definition mutual agreement termination employee contribution severance pay eligibility labor contract resolution healthcare restructuring

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 3 k.p.
art. 1 ust. 1, art. 4, art. 8 ust. 1 pkt 7, art. 8 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 30 sierpnia 1991 r. o zakładach opieki zdrowotnej
art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy o zakł. opieki zdrowotnej
art. 3 k.p
art. 231 k.p
art. 22 § 1 k.p
art. 30 § 1 k.p
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 231 § 1 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text