Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 284/02 AI generated

Supreme Court remands case to determine if a protected workshop is a legal employer under labor law.

Case Number I PK 284/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's judgment ordering the return of an employee to work and remanded the case for retrial. The lower court found the employer's stated reason for dismissal invalid but failed to definitively identify the legal employer between the sole proprietor and the protected workshop. The Supreme Court ruled that the legal status of the employer depends on whether the protected workshop is sufficiently organizationally and financially separated to act as an independent employer.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3 k.p.; Art. 551 k.c.; A protected workshop constitutes a legal employer under labor law only if it is sufficiently organizationally, financially, and legally separated from the proprietor to possess independent capacity to employ workers.

Keywords

AI generated
protected workshop labor law employer separation of assets sole proprietorship employment contract validity labor dispute remand for retrial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 3 k.p.
art. 551 k.c.
art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
ustawa z dnia 27 sierpnia 1997 r. o rehabilitacji zawodowej i społecznej oraz zatrudnianiu osób niepełnosprawnych
art. 3 k.p
art. 551 k.c
art. 45 § 1 k.p
art. 199 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c
art. 460 § 1 k.p.c
art. 30 § 4 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZP 152/92
III CRN 54/96

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text