Supreme Court dismisses prosecutor's appeal on retirement pay as inadmissible under specific procedural rules.

The Supreme Court rejected Edward Z.'s appeal against the General Prosecutor's decision setting his retirement pay at 100% of his last salary. The prosecutor argued that the calculation incorrectly excluded functional allowances, while the General Prosecutor's Office contended that the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction. The court ruled the appeal inadmissible because the General Prosecutor acts as an authorized agent of the organization paying the pension, not as a body exercising constitutional power, meaning the specific appeal mechanism does not apply.