Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 38/09 AI generated

Cassation appeal dismissed; cessation of practice requires invalid contract clauses to cease binding consumers.

Case Number III SK 38/09
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by RWE Polska SA against the President of the Competition and Consumer Protection Office. The Office had declared RWE's use of specific contract clauses in general terms as a practice violating collective consumer interests. The Court ruled that cessation of such a practice is only possible when the invalid contract clauses cease to bind consumers, which had not occurred. Consequently, the Court found the Office's decision to order cessation without this prerequisite to be legally unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 23e ust. 1 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów; Art. 23a ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów: Cessation of a practice violating collective consumer interests requires the enterprise to comply with the provisions on which the illegality was based, meaning invalid contract clauses must cease to bind consumers.

Keywords

AI generated
cessation of practice collective consumer interests invalid contract clauses general terms and conditions energy supply contracts competition law binding effect of clauses

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 23e ust. 1 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Art. 23a ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Art. 6 ust. 3 i 3a Prawa energetycznego
Art. 6a ust. 1 pkt 1 Prawa energetycznego
Art. 5 ust. 2 Prawa energetycznego
art. 385 § 2 k.c
art. 354 k.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 6 k.c
art. 3852 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text