Supreme Court dismisses appeal allowing fines despite lack of settled case law on dominant position abuse.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a fine imposed for alleged abuse of a dominant position. The appellant argued that the lack of settled case law regarding the specific conduct prevented a valid penalty, while the Competition Authority maintained the refusal to supply gas constituted a violation. The court ruled that the absence of a consistent judicial line does not bar the imposition of fines, emphasizing that the administrative body's doubts and conflicting interpretations did not justify the penalty.